WARNING: THE FOLLOWING PRESENTATION IS CONTROVERSIAL AND MAY BE OFFENSIVE TO SOME AUDIENCES.
"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic" Dresden James
“Freedom cannot exist where the outcome of a vote is purported to command the obedience of the otherwise unwilling. Eric, WhoRU
"In defense of the world Order, U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die. ... We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money."
-- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Back to the Womb, July/August 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs.
Globalist Plan to Disarm America:
PL87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act /
State Department Publication No.7277
by Bernadine Smith
If someday your children or grandchildren ask you how Liberty died in America and what happened that caused the demise of the Nation, read this and you will be able to answer them.
If they ask you why the Citizens have been disarmed, you'll know. If you want to know why, go to your local library, no matter where you live in the United States. Tell the librarian to show you where the 'United States Code books' are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC. These hard-covered books are printed every 8-10 years. They are updated with annual soft-back supplements each year until a new hard cover issue comes out. At the present time, the 1988 hardbacks are on library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9. The page numbers are in the center near the middle binding. The section numbers are along the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 651. Here you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)
TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by "disarmament." The disarmament calls for the elimination of our armed forces. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds.
(This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a).
TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed forces..." and as Item (d)" ...Elimination of armed forces...." What you need to know is that your armed forces are being eliminated and relinquished from national control which, in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two stages, we will have no more army, no more navy, no more air force. In the third stage, we shall have a "zero" military. Before Stage I closes, all citizen owned guns are to be banned.
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a).
Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. Your librarian can also furnish you a copy. Also ask the librarian to get you a copy of "The Blue Print for the Peace Race." It is a 35-page booklet printed by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 - General Series 3 - Released May of 1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State Department Document 7277.
Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1 million men. China and the Soviets are to be reduced to that level also. At this point, we are at Stage I at which time we are to transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage II, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to this same Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian. The world's smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security, Council in Stage II. President George Bush and Admiral Wm. J. Crowe [have referred] to this process as being "in transition."
TURN TO PAGE 655. On this page in Volume 9 of the United States Code, read "Policy Formation." The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone from disarmament, reducing or limiting our armaments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the president, or if it is authorized by further legislation by the Congress. (This is title 22, Section 2573.)
Every couple of years the House of Representatives votes to appropriate funds for this on-going program. Since P.L. 87-297 was first passed into law in 961, there have been 18 updates to it - all bad - with no deletions of these issues I lay before you now. The Congress knows that the plan includes the policing of the United States by foreign troops. (The world army they are forming in Europe.) The Congress is allowing our military bases to be closed down, except for those that will be used by the world army. You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in "The Blueprint for the Peace Race."
If the president and Congress can promote a "Constitutional Convention" you will find yourself with two new constitutions (communist in structure) which in one states in Article VIII, Section 12: "No person shall bear arms or possess lethal weapons except the police and members of the armed forces...."
The Congress has praised these documents and is on record in Senate hearings seeking ways to install these constitutions. Ask your librarian for "Revision of the United Nations Charter - Hearings Before a Subcommittee (Foreign Relations) Feb. 2-20, 1950 U.S.Government Printing Office." Nothing has changed since. They are still viable. The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force...."
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined above. While you are at it, look up Public Law 101-216.
State Department Publication 7277 is available at:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/guns/dos7277.htm and in electronic form as file PUB_7277.ZIP on at least the following bulletin boards:
Paul Revere - San Jose (408) 947-7800 or (408) 279-0872
The Rising Storm (408) 739-8693
If in future years your children or grandchildren ask why you allowed their freedom to slip through your fingers, no
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/un/do.htm
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&c hannel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=769&q=Title+22+USC+section+2551% 29&btnG=Google+Search&oq=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&a mp;gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2334l2334l0l4525l1l1l0l0l0l0l222l222l2-1l1l0#sclient=psy-ab&hl=e n&client=firefox-a&hs=0eG&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&s ource=hp&q=Title+22+USC+section+2551&pbx=1&oq=Title+22+USC+section+2551&aq =f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=d&gs_upl=2369l2369l0l2389l1l1l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0&bav= on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=f17bb8e80dc5eb17&biw=1440&bih=769
ï‚· 22 USC 2551 - Sec. 2551. Congressional statement of purpose - US ...
us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-congressional-statement-purpose-19203839
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
22 USC 2551 - Sec. 2551. Congressional statement of purpose - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse - Subchapter I - General Provisions - Id ...
ï‚· 22 USC 2751 - Sec. 2751. Need for international defense ...
us-code.vlex.com/.../need-controls-presidential-waiver-arms-192035...
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse. Linked as ... of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2551 of this title, and Tables. ...
ï‚· United States Code: Title 22,2551. Congressional statement of ...
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_22_00002551----000-.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
TITLE 22 > CHAPTER 35 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 2551 ... systems as may become part of United States arms control, nonproliferation, and ... U.S. Code Toolbox ...
ï‚· Chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament - U.S. Code - House of ...
uscode.house.gov/download/pls/22C35.txtCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
... 22 USC Sec. 2551 01/07/2011 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE CHAPTER 35 - ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT ...
ï‚· The following material was prepared and distributed by Bernadine ...
www.skepticfiles.org/ezine/disarmus.htmCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC section 2551) TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by "disarmament. ...
ï‚· Public Law 87-297 Globalist Plan to Disarm America:
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/.../194118Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Jan 24, 2011 – (This is Title 22 USC section 2551). TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition. 22 USC 2551 - Sec. 2551. Congressional statement ...
ï‚· DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY PUBLIC OFFICIALS - No-debts.com
www.no-debts.com/anti-federalist/files/2ndamen2.txt
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2551.) TURN TO PAGE 555. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by "disarmament." Find it on the lower ...
ï‚· Title 22 -- Foreign Relations and Intercourse
www.mindserpent.com/.../US_Code/title_22/title_22_chap68.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
-CITE- 22 USC Sec. 5902 01/23/00 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND ... (b)(1) and (d)(4), is set out in a note under section 2551 of this title. ...
ï‚· 22 U.S.C. 35 - ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT
www.gpo.gov/.../pagedetails.action?...Title...USCODE...title22...USC...Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Feb 1, 2010 – United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 3, Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS .... SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS (sections 2551 - 2552) ...
ï‚· Disarmament and military takeover of America [Archive ...
thefiringline.com › ... › Law and Civil Rights › Legal and PoliticalCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
14 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Jun 25, 1999
Title 22 USC section 2551 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/22/2551.html ) TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the ...
http://libertygunrights.com/Volume9_pg1.gif
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE VOTING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR FIREARMS?
TITLE 22
FOREIGN RELATIONS AND
INTERCOURSE TO TITLE 25 INDIANS
VOLUME 9
If you do want to know why, go to your local library,
no matter where you live in the United States. Tell
the librarian to show you where the United States Code
books are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They
are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the
Government Printing Office in Washington, D.C. These
hard-covered books are
printed every 8-10 years. They are up-dated with
annual soft-back supplements each year until a new
hard-cover issue comes out. At the present time the
1982 hardbacks are on the library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9. The page numbers are set in the center
near the middle binding. The section numbers are along
the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 554. Here you will find Public Law 87-297
which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed
forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961.
John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has
worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you
will not approve which is why they want to take away your
firearms. (This is Title 22 USC Section 2551.)
TURN TO PAGE 555. Here you will find the definition of
what the government means by "disarmament." Find it on
the lower right hand side of the page. The disarmament
calls for the elimination of our armed forces. It also
calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds. (This
is Title 22 USC 2552 (a)).
TURN TO PAGE 557. Here you will find it stated as Item
(a) "... Control, reduction and elimination of armed
forces..." and as Item (d) "... Elimination of armed
forces..". What you need to know is that your armed
forces are being eliminated from national control which,
in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two
stages we shall have no more army, no more navy, and no
more air force. In the third stage we shall have a "zero"
militiary. Before Stage I closes, all citizen-owned guns
will be banned. (This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a)).
HOW SAFE WILL YOU BE THEN?
Note: The 1988 U.S. Code Books are now in your library. Find Pages 651, 652, 654 and 655 for Title 22 and various sections listed here. Also see Public Law 101-216.
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=769&q=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&btnG=Google+Search&oq=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2334l2334l0l4525l1l1l0l0l0l0l222l222l2-1l1l0 - sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=uMb&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&source=hp&q=Title+22+USC+2552+(a)+&pbx=1&oq=Title+22+USC+2552+(a)+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=2074l2074l4l2467l1l1l0l0l0l0l77l77l1l1l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=f17bb8e80dc5eb17&biw=1440&bih=769
ï‚· 22 USC 2552 - Sec. 2552. Definitions - US Code - Title 22: Foreign ...
us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-definitions-19203838
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
22 USC 2552 - Sec. 2552. Definitions - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse - Subchapter I - General Provisions - Id 19203838 - As used in this ...
ï‚· USC 22 - US CODE 22 - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and ...
us-code.vlex.com/source/us-code-foreign-relations-intercous.../41Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
USC 22 - US CODE 22 - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse - Chapter 35 - Arms Control and ... 22 USC 2552 - Sec. 2552. Definitions ...
ï‚· Chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament - U.S. Code - House of ...
uscode.house.gov/download/pls/22C35.txtCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
-End- -CITE- 22 USC Sec. 2552 01/07/2011 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE CHAPTER 35 - ARMS CONTROL AND ...
ï‚· United States Code: Title 22,2552. Definitions | LII / Legal ...
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_22_00002552----000-.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(a) The terms “arms control†and “disarmament†mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, ...
ï‚· [PDF]
Taking Away Your Firearms
usa-the-republic.com/jurisprudentia/Taking_Away%20Firearms.pdf
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
Title 22 USC 2552 (a)). TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed forces..." and as Item (d) ". ...
ï‚· 22 U.S.C. 2552 - Definitions
www.gpo.gov/.../pagedetails.action?...USCODE...Title...USCODE...tit...Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Feb 1, 2010 – 22 U.S.C. 2552 - Definitions. ... United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 3, Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE ...
ï‚· Definitions (U.S.C. Title: 22, Chapter: 35, Subchapter: I, Section ...
corpuslegalis.com/us/code/title22/cited/definitions54
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Section 2552—Definitions is cited in: U.S.C TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE. Chapter 35—ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT Show ...
ï‚· LF: Globalist Plan to Disarm America
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=26207Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Nov 27, 2011 – (This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a). TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed ...
ï‚· Title 22 of the United States Code - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_22_of_the_United_States_CodeCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Title 22 of the United States Code outlines the role of foreign relations and intercourse in the United States Code. 22 U.S.C. ch.1—Diplomatic and Consular ...
ï‚· News Headlines: Disarming America & The World
www.helpfreetheearth.com/news90_weapons.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a). TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed forces..." and as Item (d)" . ...
22 USC 2552 - Sec. 2552. Definitions
US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse http://us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-definitions-19203838
As used in this chapter - (a) The terms "arms control" and "disarmament" mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace. (b) The term "Government agency" means any executive department, commission, agency, independent establishment, corporation wholly or partly owned by the United States which is an instrumentality of the United States, or any board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, authority, administration, or other establishment in the executive branch of Government.
Amendments
1998 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 1223(2), struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "The term 'Agency' means the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency."
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1998 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 105-277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105-277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
more results about "title 22 usc 2552 (a) " in vLex United States
more results about "title 22 usc 2552 (a) " in Todo vLex
Related searches
Camera (Definition)
Common (Definition)
Definitive
Evidence (Definition)
Extremis (Definition)
In Blank (Definition)
Issue (Definition)
Law (Definition)
Loco Parentis (Definition)
Logging (Definition)
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=769&q=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&btnG=Google+Search&oq=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2334l2334l0l4525l1l1l0l0l0l0l222l222l2-1l1l0 - pq=title+22+usc+section+2571+(a).+&hl=en&cp=29&gs_id=2x&xhr=t&q=Title+22+USC+Section+2571+(a)&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&client=firefox-a&hs=P4v&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=Title+22+USC+Section+2571+(a)+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=f17bb8e80dc5eb17&biw=1440&bih=769&bs=1
ï‚· Chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament - U.S. Code - House of ...
uscode.house.gov/download/pls/22C35.txtCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
2551 01/07/2011 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND .... title and amending sections 2571, 2581, and 2589 of this title and section 5315 of Title 5, ...
ï‚· 22 USC 2571 - Sec. 2571. Research, development and other ...
us-code.vlex.com/vid/research-development-other-studies-19203829
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
22 USC 2571 - Sec. 2571. Research, development and other studies - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse - Subchapter III - Functions - Id ...
ï‚· United States Code: Title 22,2551. Congressional statement of ...
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode22/usc_sec_22_00002551----00...Cached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
1635, provided: “That this Act [amending sections 2571, 2585, and 2589 of this .... and 502B(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151n (b) and ...
ï‚· The following material was prepared and distributed by Bernadine ...
www.skepticfiles.org/ezine/disarmus.htmCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a). Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document, called Publication 7277. ...
ï‚· DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY PUBLIC OFFICIALS - No-debts.com
www.no-debts.com/anti-federalist/files/2ndamen2.txt
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a)). HOW SAFE WILL YOU BE THEN? Note: The 1988 U.S. Code Books are now in your library. Find Pages 651, 652, ...
ï‚· Globalist Plan to Disarm America - PL87-297 Arms Control and ...
www.sweetliberty.org/issues/un/do.htmCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a). Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. Your librarian can ...
ï‚· Disarmament and military takeover of America [Archive ...
thefiringline.com › ... › Law and Civil Rights › Legal and PoliticalCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
14 posts - 12 authors - Last post: Jun 25, 1999
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a) http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/22/2571.html ). Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the ...
Get more discussion results
ï‚· FreedomTorch.com - Smalls arms treaty the UN.. Trojan horse in The USA
freedomtorch.com/forums/topic/3925/smalls-arms-treaty-the-un-trojCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
3 posts - Last post: Mar 2
{This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a)}. Public Law 87-297 is further ex-plained in the State Department Docu-ment called Publication 7277. ...
Get more discussion results
ï‚· LF: Globalist Plan to Disarm America
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=26207Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Nov 27, 2011 – (This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a). Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. ...
ï‚· News Headlines: Disarming America & The World
www.helpfreetheearth.com/news90_weapons.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a). Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. Your librarian can ...
http://us-code.vlex.com/vid/research-development-other-studies-19203829
22 USC 2571 - Sec. 2571. Research, development and other studies
US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse
Text
The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to exercise his powers in this subchapter in such manner as to ensure the acquisition of a fund of theoretical and practical knowledge concerning disarmament and nonproliferation.
To this end, the Secretary of State is authorized and directed, under the direction of the President, (1) to ensure the conduct of research, development, and other studies in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament; (2) to make arrangements (including contracts, agreements, and grants) for the conduct of research, development, and other studies in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament by private or public institutions or persons; and (3) to coordinate the research, development, and other studies conducted in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament by or for other Government agencies.
In carrying out his responsibilities under this chapter, the Secretary of State shall, to the maximum extent feasible, make full use of available facilities, Government and private.
The authority of the Secretary under this chapter with respect to research, development, and other studies concerning arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament shall be limited to participation in the following: (a) Control, reduction and elimination of armed forces and armaments the detection, identification, inspection, monitoring, limitation, reduction, control, and elimination of armed forces and armaments, including thermonuclear, nuclear, missile, conventional, bacteriological, chemical, and radiological weapons: (b) Weapon detection and identification tests the techniques and systems of detecting, identifying, inspecting, and monitoring of tests of nuclear, thermonuclear, and other weapons; (c) Analysis of national budgets and economic indicators the analysis of national budgets, levels of industrial production, and economic indicators to determine the amounts spent by various countries for armaments (!1) and of all aspects of anti-satellite activities; (d) Space, earth's surface and underwater regions the control, reduction, and elimination of armed forces and armaments in space, in areas on and beneath the earth's surface, and in underwater regions; (e) Structure and operation of international control the structure and operation of international control and other organizations useful for arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament; (f) Training of control system personnel the training of scientists, technicians, and other personnel for manning the control systems which may be created by international arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements; (g) Danger of war from accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack the reduction and elimination of the danger of war resulting from accident, miscalculation, or possible surprise attack, including (but not limited to) improvements in the methods of communications between nations; (h) Economic and political consequences of disarmament the economic and political consequences of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament, including the problems of readjustment arising in industry and the reallocation of national resources; (i) Disarmament implications of foreign and national security policies of United States the arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament implications of foreign and national security policies of the United States with a view to a better understanding of the significance of such policies for the achievement of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament; (j) National security and foreign policy implications of disarmament the national security and foreign policy implications of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament proposals with a view to a better understanding of the effect of such proposals upon national security and foreign policy; (k) Methods for maintenance of peace and security during stages of disarmament methods for the maintenance of peace and security during different stages of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament; (g742l) War prevention factors the scientific, economic, political, legal, social, psychological, military, and technological factors related to the prevention of war with a view to a better understanding of how the basic structure of a lasting peace may be established; and (m) Other related problems such related problems as the Secretary of State may determine to be in need of research, development, or study in order to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
Amendments
1998 - Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 1223(6)(A)-(E), in introductory provisions, inserted "this subchapter in" after "powers in", substituted "Secretary of State" for "Director" wherever appearing and "ensure" for "insure" in two places, struck out "in accordance with procedures established under section 2575 of this title" after "other Government agencies", and substituted "The authority of the Secretary under this chapter with respect to research, development, and other studies concerning arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament shall be limited to participation in the following:" for "The authority of the Director with respect to research, development, and other studies shall be limited to participation in the following insofar as they relate to arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament:". Subsec. (l). Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 1223(6)(F), inserted "and" at end. Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 1223(6)(B), substituted "Secretary of State" for "Director". 1994 - Pub. L. 103-236, in introductory provisions, substituted "fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament" for "field of arms control and disarmament" in three places, in first sentence, inserted "and nonproliferation" after "disarmament", and in fourth sentence, inserted ", nonproliferation," after "arms control" wherever appearing. 1982 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97-339 inserted "and of all aspects of antisatellite activities". 1977 - Pub. L. 95-108 struck out "United States" before "private" in cl. (2) of opening par. 1963 - Pub. L. 88-186 inserted "United States" before "private" in cl. (2) of opening par.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1998 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 105-277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105-277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF CONVENTIONAL ARMS Pub. L. 92-352, title III, Sec. 302, July 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 495, directed Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, with cooperation of other agencies, to prepare a comprehensive report on international transfer of conventional arms and submit this report no later than one year after July 13, 1972, with an interim report submitted no later than six months after July 13, 1972.
Guns ... or Not?
Do you want to know why public officials are voting to take away your firearms?
FREEDOM FROM WAR:
The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
PUBLICATION 7277
Disarmament Series 5
Released September 1961
Office of Public Services
BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
INTRODUCTION
The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:
First, there must be immediate disarmament action:
A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.
Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:
The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.
Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:
There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.
There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.
SUMMARY
DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES
The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form port of the total program.
GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and
Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.
DISARMAMENT STAGES
The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institution.
FIRST STAGE
The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:
The nuclear threat would be reduced:
All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or limited; their testing would be limited or halted.
Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons of mass destruction would be prohibited.
States would give advance notification of space vehicle and military launchings.
U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
Measures would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.
An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
States would be committed to measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
A U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
States would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements which might cause alarm, observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
SECOND STAGE
The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:
Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;
Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;
Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.
THIRD STAGE
During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:
States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
The peace keeping capabilities of the United nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
APPENDIX
DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT
THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD
The nations of the world,
Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;
Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted of man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
(a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required of preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
(b) the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
(d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
Call on the negotiating states:
(a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
(b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
(c) Also to seek - without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program - agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
(a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safe-guarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
(b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
(c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely thesecurity of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
(d) As stated relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as will as to facilitate the development of international cooperation an common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
(e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
STAGE I
A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
(a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
(b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
(c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.
B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
(d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.
C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
(a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
(b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
(c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
(d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
(e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
(f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
(a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfer to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
(c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
(a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
(b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle. F. To reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
(c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
(d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations of the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.
G. To Keep the Peace:
(a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force - including nuclear, conventional, or CBR - contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
(b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
(c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
(d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
(e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be despatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
STAGE II
A. International Disarmament Organization:
The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.
B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
(d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
(e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.
D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
E. To Keep the Peace:
During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the united Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the united Nations:
(a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the united Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
(c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.
STAGE III
By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force (emphasis added) and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
(c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
The end of Publication 7277
THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY BULLETIN
Less Government, More Responsibility, And
- With God's Help -
A Better World
No. 383 April 1991
Whose Side Are They On?
by
John F. McManus
In the interest of peace, many Americans have been persuaded to support disarmament programs and to create as a substitute for each nation's military a United Nations Peace Force. Most feel certain that their own rights and the independence of their nation would in no way be placed in jeopardy. But there is a vital question few seem willing or able to ask:
Who would be left to restrain the all-powerful United Nations?
For his Secretaries of State and Defense, President John F. Kennedy selected Dean Rusk and Robert S. McNamara. Each was a member of the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations, a private organization formed in 1921 for the purpose of bringing about a one-world government.
Only nine months into his administration - on September 25, 1961, to be precise - Mr. Kennedy travelled to UN headquarters in New York to present a proposal entitled Freedom From War: The United States Program For General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The work of the Rusk-led State Department, with the willing acquiescence of the McNamara-led Defense Department, the proposal was published as "Department of State Publication 7277."
In his remarks before the UN, President Kennedy asked for a commitment from all nations "not to an arms race, but to a peace race - to advance together step by step, stage by stage, until general and complete disarmament has been achieved." He did not get any such commitment, yet the United States embarked on the Kennedy-launched program.
Freedom From War (or "7277," as it is frequently called) proposes three stages of disarmament ending with the transfer of the armed forces of our nation to the United Nations. As Senator Joseph Clark of Pennsylvania approvingly reminded his colleagues in a Senate speech on March 1, 1962, this program is "the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States."
A reading of the document itself confirms that disarmament "would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force...." In other words, the only significant military power left in the world would be the United Nations.
The provisions of the treacherous proposal would actually leave our nation defenseless before the UN, and before any other nation that didn't similarly disarm. And it would place the UN's superior military power in the hands of the UN's Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs, the overseer of all UN military activity. This post, by virtue of a secret agreement concluded at the founding of the UN (an arrangement later confirmed by an astonished former UN Secretary General named Trygve Lie), has always been held by a communist. The man who holds it today, is Vasiliy S. Safronchuk of the Soviet Union. Unless our leaders are stopped, they will succeed in turning over our military forces to the United Nations where they will be controlled by a communist.
Since the UN was created, there have been 14 Undersecretaries for Political and Security Council Affairs. All have been communists, and all but one have come from the Soviet Union.
1946-1949 Arkady Sobolev 1963-1965 V.P. Suslov
(USSR) (USSR)
1949-1953 Konstantin Zinchenko 1965-1968 Alexei E. Nesterenko
(USSR) (USSR)
1953-1954 Ilya Tchernychev 1968-1973 Leonid N. Kutakov
(USSR) (USSR)
1954-1957 Dragoslav Protitch 1973-1978 Arkady N. Shevchenko
(Yugoslavia) (USSR)
1958-1960 Anatoly Dobrynin 1978-1981 Mikhail D. Styenko
(USSR) (USSR)
1960-1962 Georgy Arkadev 1981-1986 Viacheslav A. Ustinov
(USSR) (USSR)
1962-1963 E.D. Kiselev 1987- Vasiliy S. Safronchuk
(USSR) (USSR)
Subverting Our Sovereignty
Are our leaders really implementing this plan? Yes, they are! The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty is part of it; the treaty banning the use of outer space for nuclear weapons is part of it; the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is part of it; and so is the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, signed by President Reagan and Soviet leader Gorbachev and ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1988.
When Freedom From War was first made public, many startled Americans tried to obtain a copy. It was quickly declared "out of print" by federal authorities. Then, it was superseded in April 1962 by a "more precise" statement of the U.S. disarmament policy in a document entitled Blueprint For the Peace Race: Outline of Basic Provisions of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
Presented formally to an 18-nation UN Committee on Disarmament meeting in Geneva, the foreword to the Blueprint states that it doesn't cancel the plans given in Freedom From War. It merely "elaborates and extends the proposals of September 25," the date that Freedom From War was unveiled at UN headquarters by President Kennedy. In complete accord with Freedom From War, the Blueprint spells out its overall goal in the third of its three stages: "The Parties to the Treaty would progressively strengthen the United Nations Peace Force established in Stage II until it had sufficient armed forces and armaments so that no state could challenge it."
When questioned about the commitment of the United States to the Blueprint, A. Richard Richstein, General Council of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, stated in a May 11, 1982 letter that "the United States has never formally withdrawn this proposal." In January 1991, William Nary, the official; historian of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, confirmed again that "the proposal has not been withdrawn." Mr. Nary also confirmed that "certain features of it have been incorporated into subsequent disarmament agreements."
In summary, the plan to disarm the United States in favor of an all-powerful United Nations Peace Force is unfolding. It calls for relinquishing virtually all of our nation's military forces to a UN command whose leader, by agreement between the U.S. and the USSR during the founding sessions leading to the creation of the UN, will always be a communist. In the end, "no state could challenge" the communist-led military power of the United Nations.
This supposed "disarmament" program, therefore, is not as much about weapons elimination as it is about weapons distribution and control. If the program succeeds, only the UN and those nations skirting UN weapons prohibitions will be armed. It is remarkably similar to the drive that would outlaw private ownership of firearms. (emphasis added) If that drive should ever succeed, only the government and those who are outlaws would possess guns. Law-abiding citizens would be at their mercy in the latter case; law-abiding nations would be at the mercy of the UN and outlaw nations in the other.
Background To This Situation
How did we get into such a situation? Who are the individuals promoting such a suicidal proposal? Why is Congress going along instead of repudiating this dangerous program? How do we get out of it before it's too late?
At the founding of the United Nations in 1945, the delegation from the United States included a young State Department official named Alger Hiss. Widely acclaimed for both his ability and his enthusiasm for the world organization, he rose to become the acting secretary general of the founding UN conference. As a member of the steering and executive committees of the conference, he played a major role in drafting the UN Charter. He also helped to staff the U.S. delegation and was chosen by his peers for the prestigious task of personally transporting the Charter to the President and to the Senate for ratification.
Alger Hiss, however, was later found to have been a secret communist, more loyal to a foreign power than to the nation of his birth. A 1950 State department document named 15 other key U.S. government officials who were responsible for planning the creation of the UN. They, too, were subsequently named as secret communists by official agencies.
Five years after the 1945 founding of the United nations, official records released by the State Department# identified the individuals listed below as key U.S. contributors to the planning for the world organization. Each of the 16 was subsequently identified in sworn testimony before U.S. government agencies as a secret communist.
Alger Hiss Nathan Gregory Silvermaster
Harry Dexter White Harold Glasser
Virginius Frank Coe Victor Perlo
Noel Field Irving Kaplan
Laurence Duggan Solomon Adler
Henry Julian Wadleigh Abraham George Silverman
John Carter Vincent William K. Ullman
David Weintraub William H. Taylor
# Postwar Foreign Policy Preparation, 1939-1945, U.S. State Department
Not only was the U.S. represented by a sizable number of communists, our nation's delegation also contained 43 individuals who were then or soon would be members of America's leading Establishment organization, the privately-run Council on Foreign Relations. Alger Hiss himself was both a communist and a CFR member as was another U.S. member of the UN planning team, Lauchlin Currie. As communists, and as CFR members, they worked diligently to bring the world government into existence, and they labored just as hard to have the United States a part of it.
There were, of course, delegations from the USSR and the other founding nations. These were made up of communists, socialists, one-worlders, and easily manipulated starry-eyed dreamers. All were committed to world government at the expense of national sovereignty. All wanted the United Nations to be supreme. There was to be no more war as soon as the United Nations was given sufficient power, especially unchallenged military power, to keep the peace.
For the past 45 years, intense pro-UN propaganda has convinced many Americans (and many others as well) that the words "peace" and "United Nations" are virtually interchangeable. Anyone who opposes the UN risks being labelled a warmonger. Those who support the UN customarily find themselves showered with accolades.
Peace is so universally desired that almost anything seems reasonable to achieve it. Proposals to empower the UN with the world's dominant military capability have received widespread support. At first glance, the idea may seem to have some merit. A world police force formed to keep the peace. Wouldn't it be wonderful!
Suppose, however, that the unchallengeable power of the United Nations fill into the wrong hands? Suppose it ended up at the disposal of Alger Hiss and his comrades? Couldn't it be used to impose a tyranny on the rest of mankind? Wouldn't any would-be tyrant gravitate to the organization?
Even if the UN wire not run by communists, socialists, and one-worlders who despise nationhood, wouldn't the awesome power we are talking about be sufficient to corrupt anyone? Who would be able to bridle any UN leaders who had been given greater power than anyone else on earth?
Don't Discard Americanism
It can't be said too often that America is unique. Our nation began with the thunderous assertion in the Declaration of Independence that "men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights." According to the founding premise of this nation, rights come from God, not from government. And the declaration then declared that governments are formed solely "to secure those rights." That's all! Secure God-given rights, not provide for wants, redistribute the wealth, or make dependent serfs out of the people.
With the marvelous foundation laid in the Declaration, the men who formed this unique and wonderful nation the wrote a Constitution whose sole purpose was to govern the government, not the people. America was expected to be a nation where the government was limited by law and the people were limited by freely accepted moral codes such as those found in the Ten Commandments.
Nothing like America had ever existed in all history. And did this nation prosper! Millions left the old world to come here penniless - not to be cared for but to enjoy freedom and opportunity. America became the hope of the world - even for these who were not fortunate enough to live within our borders.
The United Nations, on the other hand, has no place for God. If rights don't come from God, the presumption is that they are granted by government. The UN actually fosters such a presumption, as can be discovered in its International Covenants on Human Rights.
What must be understood is that a government that presumes to grant fundamental rights - which is what the UN does - is a government that can suspend them at will. If the "self evident " truths in the Declaration of Independence are canceled or forgotten in favor of the UN's ways, all rights given us by our Creator will exist only at the extremely dubious pleasure of the United Nations.
The reality here is that the UN turns the entire American system on its head. To consider submitting our nation to the dictates of the anti-American, pro-communist and Godless United Nations is suicidal. Yet, this is exactly what our leaders have been working towards for several decades. Sad to say, it is perfectly obvious that this is precisely what President Bush is talking about when he repeatedly expresses his desire to create a "new world order."
Unfortunately, the desire for peace has clouded the vision of many otherwise clear-thinking Americans. Many have been persuaded to think only of the concept of "peace," but not what kind of peace. No one should ever forget that there is the peace of the grave, the peace of submission, and the communist peace that consists of no opposition to communism. Peace with justice, the goal of anyone possessing good will, is as likely under United Nations domination as is the chance that water will flow uphill.
Whenever thoughts such as these are brought to the attention of sensible Americans, enthusiasm for UN-style peace diminishes rapidly. "Let's keep our independence!" is a common response. "Why should we trust others to look after our well-being?" is another. But too few are aware of the dangers inherent in an all-powerful world government. And too few, therefore, have been guarding against transferring U.S. military forces and U.S. sovereignty to the United Nations.
The “New World Orderâ€
In an exclusive interview published in the December 31, 1990/January 7, 1991 issue of U.S. News and World Report, President Bush called for "a reinvigorated United Nations" that he hoped would bring about the "new world order." What should be reinvigorated instead are the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
During a January 9, 1991 press conference, Mr. Bush said that the crisis in the Middle East "has to do with a new world order [that] is only going to be enhanced if this newly activated peacekeeping function of the United Nations proves to be effective." Obviously, he considers our forces in the Middle East to have been under the UN's peacekeeping jurisdiction. And isn't it curious that this supposed "peace" organization's authority was used in starting the war in the Middle East?
Then, in his January 19, 1991 speech to the nation, the President again touted the "new world order," describing it as "an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders." He didn't remind anyone that the UN's founders were communists, socialists, one-worlders, and starry-eyed dreamers who would happily tear down the unique foundations of the United States and replace them with the UN Charter.
What To Do To Save America
Answers to some of the questions we have already raised, and to others that anyone reading this pamphlet must have, begin with an understanding of the grip on America held by the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Bush, a member of the CFR's Board of Directors as recently as 1979, can point to more than 350 CFR members currently serving as U.S. Government officials. A similar CFR dominance prevailed during the Reagan years and in several previous administrations.
Current U.S. Officials holding membership in the CFR include Secretary of Defense Cheney, National Security Advisor Scowcroft, Joint Chiefs Chairman Powell, CIA Director Webster, and Deputy Secretary of State Eagleburger. Don't expect any to block furtherentanglement of the United States in the UN.
There are also 16 U.S. senators and a like number of U.S. representatives who hold membership in this organization. Don't expect them to protect our nation from UN domination.
Realize too, that practically nationally important organ of the news media is led by a CFR member. Any senator or representative who wishes to receive favor from the media goes along with subverting America to internationalist goals. Any senator or representative who tries to keep our nation independent runs the risk of having the media make him seem like a lunatic.
The great majority of the American people who value their freedom and their nation's independence have to become informed and alarmed about the path down which we are being taken. There will be no change without a rising tide of indignation. And there will be no rising tide of indignation until the frightening details about the ongoing subversion of this nation have been placed in the hands of many more Americans.
Happily, there are reliable sources of information both about President George Bush's commitment to his "new world order" and about the Council on Foreign Relations itself. We highly recommend two books:
1. The Establishment's Man, by James J. Drummey, a tastefully written yet devastating expose' of the political career of George Bush;
2. The Shadows of Power, by James Perloff, a history of the Council on Foreign Relations taken from its own papers and publications.
The enemy is within the gates of our great land. Those who would deliver out nation to a UN-controlled "new world order" have achieved great power and influence. Whether they are stopped in time is up to individuals who will read a pamphlet like this one, books like those recommended above, and a great deal more information that is available to anyone. Once informed, an American worthy of the name will work with others to throw the rascals out of office, and, in the words of George Washington, "put none but Americans" in charge of guarding this nation.
See the material, prepared by Bernadine Smith of the Second Amendment Committee, for documentations of the law.
The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force..."
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined above. While you are at it, look up PublicLaw 101-216.
State Department Publication 7277 is available in electronic form as file PUB_7277.ZIP on at least the following bulletin boards:
Paul Revere - San Jose (408) 947-7800 or (408) 279-0872
The Rising Storm (408) 739-8693
If in future years your children or grandchildren ask why you allowed their freedom to slip through your fingers, no one who has read this material will be able to say; "if only I had known." Now that you have read this, you know. The questionis; what are you going to do about it?
Council on Domestic Relations Home
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=769&q=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&btnG=Google+Search&oq=Title+22+USC+section+2551%29&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2334l2334l0l4525l1l1l0l0l0l0l222l222l2-1l1l0 - sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=LmG&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&source=hp&q=+title+22%2C+Section+2573&pbx=1&oq=+title+22%2C+Section+2573&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=9l3313l9l3621l4l4l0l0l0l1l190l562l0.4l4l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=f17bb8e80dc5eb17&biw=1440&bih=769
ï‚· 22 USC 2573 - Sec. 2573. Policy formulation - US Code - Title 22 ...
us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-policy-formulation-19203827
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
2573. Policy formulation - US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse ... L. 105-277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. ...
ï‚· TITLE 22 2573 - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_22_00002573----000-.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
TITLE 22 > CHAPTER 35 > SUBCHAPTER III > § 2573 ... except pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 ...
ï‚· TITLE 22 2573 - Legal Information Institute - Cornell University
www.law.cornell.edu/.../usc_sec_22_00002573----000-notes.htmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title. ...
ï‚· Policy Formulation (U.S.C. Title: 22, Chapter: 35 ... - US Code
corpuslegalis.com/us/code/title22/policy-formulation
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
... Title: 22, Chapter: 35, Subchapter: III, Section: 2573, Name: Policy ... L. 103–236 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as ...
ï‚· Policy Formulation (U.S.C. Title: 22, Chapter: 35 ... - US Code
corpuslegalis.com/us/code/title22/cited/policy-formulation
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Section 2573—Policy formulation is cited in: U.S.C TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE. Chapter 35—ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT Show ...
ï‚· To amend the Arms Control and Disarmament Act to strengthen the Arms
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103s1182is/mods.xmlCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
... Title 22 Section 2562 Title 22 Section 2565 Title 22 Section 2566 Title 22 Section 2567 Title 22 Section 2568 Title 22 Section 2573 Title 22 Section ...
ï‚· [PDF]
Taking Away Your Firearms
usa-the-republic.com/jurisprudentia/Taking_Away%20Firearms.pdf
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
The section numbers are along the edges. TURN TO PAGE 651. ... (This is Title 22 USC section 2551). TURN TO ... the Congress. (This is title 22, Section 2573.) ...
ï‚· Chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament - U.S. Code - House of ...
uscode.house.gov/download/pls/22C35.txtCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
2551 01/07/2011 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND .... this title, amending this section, sections 2562, 2565 to 2568, 2571, 2573 to 2577, 2579, ...
ï‚· The Senate's Letter to Prevent the Space Code of Conduct: Issues ...
blog.heritage.org/.../the-senates-letter-to-prevent-the-space-code-of-c...Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Feb 10, 2011 – Section 2573 of Title 22 of the U.S. Code prohibits the Administration from taking any action, including entering into non-treaty agreements, that ...
ï‚· [PDF]
IF YOU NEED PROOF THAT OUR
www.libertygunrights.com/NewVol9_3.pdf
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Look for it under Title 22, Foreign Relations and. Intercourse: Section 2551, 2552, 2571 & 2573. So that you will know what you are looking for, the following is a ...
22 USC 2573 - Sec. 2573. Policy formulation
US Code - Title 22: Foreign Relations and Intercourse http://us-code.vlex.com/vid/sec-policy-formulation-19203827
Text
(a) Formulation The Secretary of State shall prepare for the President, and the heads of such other Government agencies as the President may determine, recommendations and advice concerning United States arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy. (b) Prohibition No action shall be taken pursuant to this chapter or any other Act that would obligate the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in a militarily significant manner, except pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative legislation by the Congress of the United States. (c) Statutory construction Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to authorize any policy or action by any Government agency which would interfere with, restrict, or prohibit the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms by an individual for the lawful purpose of personal defense, sport, recreation, education, or training.
Amendments
1998 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 1223(8), substituted "Secretary of State" for "Director" and struck out "the Secretary of State," after "the President,". Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105-277, Sec. 2602, added subsec. (c). 1994 - Pub. L. 103-236 amended section generally.
Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Director is authorized and directed to prepare for the President, the Secretary of State, and the heads of such other Government agencies, as the President may determine, recommendations concerning United States arms control and disarmament policy: Provided, however, That no action shall be taken under this chapter or any other law that will obligate the United States to disarm or to reduce or to limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States, except pursuant to the treaty making power of the President under the Constitution or unless authorized by further affirmative legislation by the Congress of the United States.
Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to authorize any policy or action by any Government agency which would interfere with, restrict, or prohibit the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms by an individual for the lawful purpose of personal defense, sport, recreation, education, or training." 1963 - Pub. L. 88-186 inserted provision precluding construction of this chapter to authorize the regulation of the possession of firearms by an individual.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1998 AMENDMENT
Amendment by section 1223(8), (21) of Pub. L. 105-277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105-277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
TITLE 22 > CHAPTER 35 > SUBCHAPTER III > § 2573
§ 2573. Policy formulation
How Current is This?
(a) Formulation
The Secretary of State shall prepare for the President, and the heads of such other Government agencies as the President may determine, recommendations and advice concerning United States arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy.
(b) Prohibition
No action shall be taken pursuant to this chapter or any other Act that would obligate the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in a militarily significant manner, except pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative legislation by the Congress of the United States.
(c) Statutory construction
Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to authorize any policy or action by any Government agency which would interfere with, restrict, or prohibit the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms by an individual for the lawful purpose of personal defense, sport, recreation, education, or training.
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&c hannel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1440&bih=769&q=See+the+material%2C+prepar ed+by+Bernadine+Smith+of+the+Second+Amendment+Committee%2C+for+documentations+of+the+law.+ &btnG=Google+Search&oq=See+the+material%2C+prepared+by+Bernadine+Smith+of+the+Seco nd+Amendment+Committee%2C+for+documentations+of+the+law.+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&g s_sm=s&gs_upl=2071l2071l0l2814l1l1l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0
http://www.libertygunrights.com/
See the material, prepared by Bernadine Smith of the Second Amendment Committee, for documentations of the law.
Welcome to LibertyGunRights.com, home of the Second Amendment Committee of Hanford, California. Since 1984, the Second Amendment Committee has been providing information of benefit to those seeking a peaceful resolution to the gun crisis. Please be sure to take a good look at our Documents page. We currently have about 700 articles listed, and additional material may be available upon request. If you'd like to see what has been added or updated recently, please check out our blog.
All questions and comments regarding the material posted on this site should be directed to Bernadine Smith, founder of the Second Amendment Committee. Her e-mail address is liberty89@libertygunrights.com. You may also reach her at (559) 584–5209 during office hours.
Please make sure you are using a recent version of your web browser, such as Firefox 5, Safari 5, or Internet Explorer 9. Older browsers may not display some elements of this site correctly.
This page has been visited 114645 times since December 17, 1996.
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/9-03-03/discussion.cgi.42.html
Bernadine Smith
GENERAL ALERT TO ALL SHERIFFS
Tue Sep 2 02:10:49 2003
64.140.158.45
GENERAL ALERT TO ALL SHERIFFS
The office of sheriff is a unique and special Constitutional office. It is a part of the Check and Balance System. When a man becomes a ?sheriff?, he takes on the special responsibility of preserving and protecting the rights, liberties, and freedoms of the people within his county against unlawful acts, including any unlawful act committed by public officials working in the government. He has a direct obligation toward the people living within his county.
For over 200 years, the office of sheriff in the United States has been an office that is controlled by the people through the election process. He is elected as their choice to take hold as the chief law enforcement officer in the county. The people place great trust in him to provide protection for themselves against unlawful acts of all kinds, including usurpation and sedition. This also includes illegal acts by agencies of government. He takes an oath to uphold, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State in which his county exists.
There is no lawful authority for judges or a court to direct the law enforcement activities of a county sheriff. He is not part of the judicial system. He holds executive power. He can set up a court, empanel a jury, and can even try judges or federal officials who violate the law.
The federal government is a servant of the people, and the states, and has only the powers that have been enumerated and delegated to it in the Constitution by the action of the people and the states. The people retain all other powers not delegated to the federal government. James Madison made it quite clear that delegated power of the people is not surrendered power.
It is the duty of the federal government to guarantee a republican form of government. It has no authority to build a military government to satisfy desires for a New World Order. Ultimate authority resides in the people. The federal government may not substitute its will for the best interests and the will of the people, nor exercise authority beyond the limits set out in the Constitution. Laws repugnant to the Constitution are void.
The Sheriff must be advised of the instances in which unlawful acts are committed. Power change is like electricity: not easily seen, but the effects are strongly felt. This nation is undergoing massive, frightful, and outrageous changes in its power structure, so much so that an unwelcome militarized form of government is quietly spreading its network over us.
The people?s control over their local government ended when the federal government took control over the ?General Plans? for cities and counties. Local control over city police departments ended when the federal government acquired the nationwide ?Standard-setting Process? by using devices created by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, a commission that was instituted under the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Now, our sheriffs are being replaced by federal marshals who are non-elected personnel, who are not obligated to take an oath to the Constitution, and who are not beholden to the best interests of the people. Marshals are federal legmen. Sheriffs have been elected to protect our freedoms and to keep control local. The sheriff takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and that of his State.
Have you checked your state Constitution? It should include a stipulation that the office of sheriff must be an elective office. Does it? This effort can be enhanced by having the county Board of Supervisors pass an ordinance to support the urgency of retaining the sheriff as one who must be elected by the people. It is important to make sure that this requirement is there as it is a barrier erected against the plans of the federal government to federalize all civilian law enforcement systems.
Voters in some states have been persuaded to reduce the steadfastness of good sheriffs by approving propositions at the polls that reduce sheriffs to an appointive position. This action is the first-step in a two-step maneuver to eliminate the sheriff entirely and replace him with an appointed federal marshal. Speak to trustworthy elected officials in your county, including your county attorney, to see what defense you may undertake against these plans to eliminate sheriffs and replace them with appointed federal marshals.
Don?t let happen to your State that which has already happened in the State of Connecticut:[1] a movement which threatens to destroy the nation?s Constitutional system of sheriff authority. Is Connecticut?s problem not a classic textbook example of ?thesis, antithesis, and synthesis??
The sheriff, the last vestige of local control of government by the people, is being engineered to fall under the consolidated power of the federal government for military operation of the United States under international sovietized management. Only an informed population will prevent it from happening!
Second Amendment Committee P.O. Box 1776 Hanford, California 93232 (559) 584-5209
---------------------------------------------------
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Second Amendment Committee
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:47:01 -0700
From: Lisa Kirsch flygirl@sbcglobal.net
Sorry for the late notice:
The Second Amendment Committee
http://www.libertygunrights.com
made some changes to their Documents page on Friday. Look for the links with the
"new" graphic by them, and in the Hot Off The Press section.
You have received this e-mail because you are subscribed to the Second
Amendment Committee's updates mailing list. If you have any comments
regarding the material on their site, please contact Bernadine Smith.
There are no sheriffs left in the State of Connecticut. They have all been replaced with marshals by Public Act No. 00-99 (House Bill No. 5832 signed by the Governor).
http://www.libertygunrights.com/SheriffGeneralAlert2.html#_ftnref1
Oath of Office — Svarstaad, Tue Sep 2 21:26
Alert to all sheriffs — Linda, Tue Sep 2 19:38
Go for it! (nm) — APFN, Tue Sep 2 21:15
[apfn-1] No More Sherriffs'? — Billy-Joe..Mauldin, Tue Sep 2 14:37
THE RIGHT TO REPEL FORCE BY FORCE — H.M., Tue Sep 2 04:44
Svarstaad
Oath of Office
Tue Sep 2 21:26:19 2003
170.215.172.58
I read your article on Jeff Rense web site,
There is a significant error in which you might be interested. You said:
"Now, our sheriffs are being replaced by federal marshals who are non-elected personnel, who are not obligated to take an oath to the Constitution, and who are not beholden to the best interests of the people. Marshals are federal legmen. Sheriffs have been elected to protect our freedoms and to keep control local. The sheriff takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and that of his State."
" ... who are not obligated to take an oath to the Constitution, ..."
Your statement is NOT CORRECT.
U.S. Const Article VI, Clause 3, REQUIRES that "all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution."
Sincerely, Svarstaad
http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/apr09/index2.shtml
NEWSWATCH MAGAZINE
A magazine making clear today’s news in the light of Bible Prophecy. This magazine, a Publication of the Church of God Evangelistic Assn., features articles giving the meaning of world news in the light of Bible prophecy, Christian living material, and current issues in today’s world, that will enrich the spiritual life of those who seek to know more about God.
Vol. 29 No. 9 WORLDWIDE MINISTRY April 2009 In This Issue:
History That Must Be Told! Part 22 Editor: David J. Smith
Inquiries And Correspondence: Mail to Editor, Newswatch Magazine, 908 Sycamore Street, Waxahachie, Texas 75165 Subscriptions: Subscription rate is $24 a year in the United States and $35 a year in Canada, Europe, Union of South Africa and Australia/New Zealand. [U.S. currency only]. Donations in addition to the subscription price keeps our TV witness on the air. Send request for subscriptions to:
Newswatch Magazine
Post Office Box 36
Waxahachie, Texas 75168
Address Change: Please send prompt notification whenever your address changes. Three weeks are necessary for processing new subscriptions and address changes. Please send both old and new address on changes.
OFFICE The Church of God Evangelistic Association 908 Sycamore Street Waxahachie, Texas 75165 Phone: (972) 937-2227
Live audio: www.newswatchmagazine.org 2-4 PM CST Saturday. Sermons with audio and video: www.newswatchmagazine.org Press: WATCH VIDEO!
TV: DirecTV channel 367 - Midnight EST M, T, Wed, Fri 11pm CST; 10pm MST; 9pm PST
History That Must Be Told!
Part 22
“Let us consider that arbitrary power has seldom or never been introduced into any country at once. It must be introduced by slow degrees, and as it were step by step, LEST THE PEOPLE SHOULD SEE IT APPROACH. The barriers and fences of the people’s liberty must be plucked ONE BY ONE, and some PLAUSIBLE PRETENCES MUST BE FOUND FOR REMOVING OR HOODWINKING, ONE AFTER ANOTHER, those sentries who are posted by the constitution of a free country for warning the people of their danger. When these preparatory steps are once made, the people may then indeed, with regret, SEE SLAVERY AND ARBITRARY POWER making long strides over their land; BUT IT WILL BE TOO LATE TO THINK OF PREVENTING OR AVOIDING THE IMPENDING RUIN.â€
Philip Dormer Stanhope, Fourth Earl of Chesterfield
Statesman, and Diplomat Miscellaneous Works, Vol. IV, 1779
Could the removing of the safeguards of our constitution been in the works in secret for a long time? Will we wake up during the Obama Administration to find that the CHANGE he has called for, and the people gullibly accepted, will be from our constitutional republic to a socialistic dictatorship???
We have already seen all power being removed from the States and We the People to the international level, a totally planned society, operated by unelected managers, and cradle-to-the-grave control! Financing of this transition has been supplied by wealthy tax-exempt Foundations, such as Ford, Rockefeller, Carneige, Guggenheimer etc.
Those planning the collapse of our constitutional government, and then merging us into an international one-world-government, wrote that they needed catastrophies, major crises, collapse of local and state governments, high cost of government, and corruption of elected officials in order to succeed! Can we all honestly say these goals are being met by our subjugators?
1. Public Laws 87-297 and 101-216, signed by President John F. Kennedy, created the disarmament plan of America. It is called: General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. A map was sent to the United Nations in 1954 from our State Department showing which foreign troops would patrol which countries or sections of countries.
2. The United States would no longer be an industrial/manufacturing society, but a service oriented country. Millions would be laid off their manufacturing jobs. Has this happened? It started in the 1970s. The term “free trade†was the catch phrase to destroy the middle class manufacturing base. W. Cleon Skousen, assistant to J. Edgar Hoover, listed as one of the Communist objectives in his book, The Naked Communist, as being FREE TRADE!!! Foreign cheap goods could flood our market place, and America’s manufacturers could not compete. Tearing down of protective tariffs on foreign goods left our manufacturers vulnerable to bankruptcy, or move out of the country. THIS COMMUNIST/ILLUMINATI OBJECTIVE IS WORKING PERFECTLY!!!
3. Eliminate the 50 states and replace them with regional governments. The Federal Emergency Management Agency broke the country down into ten regions during the Nixon Administration. No one was told WHY this was done, so We the People could object to this breach of States Rights.
4. Merge civilian law enforcement with the military. This would pave the way for State Department Publication 72-77. That publication revealed that our military needed to be turned over to the U.N. in three stages, while building an INTERNAL security force to prevent riots against the overthrow of our Constitution when the people figured it out. This happened after 9/11 by creating Homeland Security, and bringing all civilian police and military under one banner. Has Barack Obama called for internal security forces equal to or exceeding our military???
5. By building the North American Union, which merges the United States, Canada, and Mexico into one OPEN BORDERS community. This policy has been a long range plan of the Illuminati/Communism as steps to form a World Government. What has Barack Obama stated consistantly? He has called for the tearing down of borders between the rich countries and the poor countries. This is pure MARXISM!!!
6. As a result of these assaults upon We the People and our republic, we will lose our Constitution and Bill of Rights, especially the 2nd Amendment, the right to own guns to protect ourselves FROM governmental tyranny!!!
1. All businesses were to be nationalized! The Federal Government would own outright or a large portion of businesses. Have we seen a fabricated economic collapse, and businesses screaming for a “bailout?†In a 1942 United States Supreme Court Decision, Wickard v. Filburn, the Court wrote that if the government subsidized something it had the right to control it. How do we think the Federal Government has taken over the states’ responsibility and left the states without power?
2. A crisis of illegal aliens over-running our country was needed to solve the problem of closed borders by allowing unrestricted immigration. This would produce the permanently open borders they are seeking. Create a problem, advertise the problem widely, and furnish the solution!!! This IS their agenda!
3. Bring about the collapse of the American dollar as the world currency. Usher in the solution - instant transfer of funds by computer, no coins, checks, cash, gold, silver, etc. There would only be a NUMBER and a BALANCE sheet with your name on it. If you resisted the New World Order, they would cancel your number, and you would become destitute!!!
4. Control of citizens is important in a world dictatorship! Therefore, everyone must be issued a National ID Card or papers. Congress has already passed the ID that would be attached to your driver’s liscense. Its usage has been delayed because some states have objected. It has been rescheduled for use in 2011.
Charles E. Merriam - Designer to Implement Socialism Step by Step!
Charles E. Merriam and two other men were hired by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s handlers to lay the plan to Socialize America. He said that there needed to be a stepby-step progression. One president would introduce one part of the socialist program, and the next president was to maintain what was already accomplished and add the next part of the plan. After a number of presidents, the plan would be finished. America would have socialism and not even know how it happened! Let’s investigate!!!
Road to CHANGE From a Republic to Socialism
You can understand that the United States is on the threshhold of destruction when statements by the Illuminati’s leaders are understood. Norman Thomas, a Socialist that ran six times as a candidate for President of the United States on the Socialist Party ticket, has stated: “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name Liberalism, they will adopt EVERY fragment of the Socialist program UNTILAmerica will one day be a Socialist nation without knowing HOW it happened.†He said that he could not get elected as a Socialist, but FDR could as a Democrat. They had the same program in mind for America!!!
Three months before his 1959 visit to the United States, Nikita Khrushchev, then ruthless dictator of the Illuminati’s International Communism stated: “We can’t expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but WE can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism UNTIL, they awaken one day to find they have COMMUNISM.â€
FDR: Socialist. Prior to falling ill with polio, he ran on the vice-presidential spot with presidential hopeful James Cox in 1920. FDR made 6 speeches in support of world government at that time. People rejected the idea of giving up Constitutional government and having the States abolished.
In 1932, despite his handicap, he managed to become elected on the Democratic ticket as U.S. President, at which time, he tried again to get the States abolished and replaced by world government regions. His New World (Moral) Order, was called the “New Deal.†He wanted to merge the nations of the Western Hemisphere into one government. By 1943, he had Ten Federal Regions operating in the United States, with named persons as chairmen. Ralph Carr, then Colorado governor, blew the whistle on what FDR was doing. The Congress cut off the funding for Roosevelt’s National Resources Planning Board and ordered it closed down.
During his years in office, much of the basic documents and plans for today’s socialist CONVERSION [CHANGE] were formed. Rockefeller funded Charles E. Merriam who taught FDR to use “democracy†as a stand-in word for communism and internationalism (world government). He tried to PACK the U.S. Supreme Court to get his socialist goals approved.
Dualistic language (double meanings - double speak) came into great use to quell all opposition. FDR took the nation off the gold standard which has resulted in debasing our money. Lenin and Marx both agreed that to debase a nation’s currency is a sure way to overthrow it. The only backing we now have for our dollars is “the full faith and credit of the United States.†We have gone from a debt free nation 100 years ago to the greatest debtor nation the world has ever seen!!!
FDR is greatly venerated today by socialists in both the Democratic and Republican parties as being their great leader, their great hero. Helping the poor or enhancing the economy is one thing, but overthrowing our system of government is called TREASON! After Roosevelt altered the president’s office, the socialist take-over of the United States has NOT STOPPED. EVERY president since then has followed his lead. Roosevelt had hoped to be the first president of the world. His signing of the United Nations Charter could have advanced him to that status, but he died of a heart attack in 1945.
The New Deal Built the New World Order!!!
The New Deal had its feet of clay mired: one in the Red mud of Soviet Communism, and the second in the stinking cesspool of pagan plutocracy (government of the wealthy). When a nation fails to learn the true history of its past, the people are doomed to reside in a state of delusions. Once deception becomes more ingrained into the popular culture, it makes the task of tyrants easier. It will take time, but eventually the country will be transformed (CHANGED), and betrayal of our principle and heritage will be completed! The masses will cling to the BIG LIE (of innocent but necessary change) as FACT!!! The new gospel for the changing of the social order will become transformed into reality. Finally, only the very few will ever question its truthfulness. The others will not even know their government has been overthrown!!!
Most of us were born into a society that had long abandoned the principles of our Founding Fathers. The quiet revolution that has destroyed America was conducted in full view and
sanctified by government approval. The past was buried without a solemn ceremony, and the New Deal was born to reconstruct a fatherland upon the ashes of the America that God had given us! The mother’s milk of this overthrow in fundamental values was, and is, based upon the Marxism of traitors. FDR was the supreme socialist and 32nd degree Freemason. High Freemasonry merged with the Illuminati in Germany on July 16, 1782 at the Council of Wilhelmsbad. His IDEAL was the total destruction of the balanced “Federalism†that shared power (executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government), State’s Rights, and individual Liberty.
Roosevelt shared a collective identity with Stalin, a lust for power that approached Hitler, and a deceit only surpassed by Winston Churchill. All four were allies of Socialism. Only slight degrees of differences disguised their mutual love for totalitarian control over their respective country and a global vision.
The New Deal was pure Socialism! Communists were proud of their involvement with FDR: “When the Great Depression of the 1930s created conditions that made working-class victories both possible and necessary, if reaction and fascism was to be defeated, Communists were at the center of building of the new unions of the CIO, and providing the grassroots force that propelled the New Deal government of Franklin Roosevelt, the most advanced government of non-socialist reform in U.S. history, to enact social security and unemployment insurance, minimum wages, and the 40-hour work [week], and create the National Relations Board to protect workers rights to form unions and other major reforms.†These were ALL CHANGES!!! What were these changes for? They were to advance Socialism in America!!!
For American citizens to look kindly upon Roosevelt and the expansion of central planning, shows a total ignorance of why our Founding Fathers fought the Revolutionary War of 1776! They distrusted and feared an all powerful central government. Yet that is exactly what we have today - an all powerful central government in Washington, D.C. When FDR’s close advisor, Douglas, said: “The present pseudo-planned economy leads relentlessly into the complete autocracy and tyranny of the Collectivist State,†it was one of the few honest statements made during the New Deal.
Examine the real historic record of the New Deal and ask if the prospect of liberty and the pursuit of happiness were fostered by converting our once free enterprise system into a system of federal alphabet despotic agencies that demand that they command and control everything!!! The future under Barack Obama will be worse than the New Deal introduced by FDR!!!
The hoax of the twentieth century was that the government was a force for REFORM (CHANGE) that leads to improvement in the condition of ordinary citizens. The New Deal was a COUP D’ETAT designed by plutocrats [rich men], for installing an oligarchy [government in the hands of the few], to achieve autocracy [government administered by someone possessing supreme power], administered by bureaucrats. Does this sound familiar???
FDR defined Freedom of Speech as Stalin did, i.e., he used the Marxist phrase “Freedom of Information†in his speeches - not freedom of speech!
FDR pressed for a bill that would eliminate the right to bear arms, the guarantee that allows all other rights to remain. Obama wants to regulate the bearing of arms, manufacturing of firearms and ammunition. Obama wants to disarm America, which is a Socialist/Communist goal!!!
FDR told Churchill that “an unwritten Constitution is better than a written one.†When Roosevelt was reminded there was the Constitution, he said, after his 1936 inauguration, “Yes, but it’s the Constitution as I understand it - flexible enough (to do what I want).†FDR admiringly told Churchill that Stalin didn’t have to worry about Congresses and Parliaments, “I’m the whole works.†In a letter to a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, FDR wrote: “I hope your committee will not permit doubt as to Constitutionality, however reasonable, to block the suggested legislation.â€
FDR did not believe in Constitutional checks and balances. He tried to destroy it and was prepared to defy the Supreme Court and Congress. He did not believe in advice and consent or the rule of law. He waged war and made treaties without the consent of Congress. He did not believe in representative government and often said that since Congress did not reflect the will of the people they should be ignored.
Probably, the best example of FDR’s procedures regarding the rule of law vs the rule of men was said by his top deputy, KGB agent Harry Hopkins, to his aides: “I want to assure you that we are not afraid of exploring anything with the law, and we have a lawyer who will declare anything you want to do legal,â€
FDR defined democracy just as Joseph Stalin did - the mere act of voting. Our current society is already brainwashed into accepting Socialism under the name of Social Security and Medicaid. Young people are indoctrinated to accept the all powerful central government instead of our Constitution that separates power into three sections, for our protection from tyranny. Black robed oppressors of the U.S. Supreme court enforce mandates, no matter how unconstitutional, upon the citizens of this once great nation. Anyone who speaks
out against it as tyranny and treasonous is made to look like a vigilante against the government. The legacy of the New Deal conditioned the people to accept the New World Order. Barack Obama will follow in FDR’s footsteps to possibly finish the job of Socializing America!!!
Most inhabitants of the United States relish their subservient status and enthusiastically embrace their captivity. The most common attitude being pushed upon us is that the world has become a global village for housing the slaves of the elite. They want you to accept your role, enjoy your condition, and praise them as your masters!!! As long as any vestige of the New Deal ushered in by the FDR Administration is considered legitimate, the prospects for restoring a true Republic are futile.
The step-by-step TRANSFORMATION into a global union under the rule of master elites has switched into high gear. FDR thrived upon a manipulated, naive citizenry. All of our parents or grandparents bought into the big lie of socialism. Don’t believe that the next and final step, the New World Order, will be beneficial! All Communists are Statists, every Fascist is a Statist, and every form of Socialism is Statism. EACH ARE UN-AMERICAN! The New Deal set the stage for the New World Order!!!
Headline: NINE GROUPS INSTEAD OF THE 48 STATES
By Delbert Clark, Washington
“There is a growing sentiment - it is still too inchoate to be termed a movement -among certain members of Congress with advanced social views and a willingness to break with tradition, in favor of drastic CHANGE in our form of government to facilitate nation-wide REFORMS frequently blocked by the very nature of our confederation. Since, obviously, there is political dynamite in any proposal to ABOLISH STATES in so far as they provide a check upon the Federal Government, no one has yet dared to broach publicly the thesis that the abolition would be in the public interest and is, in fact, a distinct possibility in the somewhat distant future. Yet there are those who feel that the CHANGE should be made...
“The time has come, THEY say, when we should realize that the functions of the Federal Government have become much more than those of a peace officer, when the PROGRESSIVE welding of forty-eight States into one nation calls for recognition, through revision of what has become a cumbersome instrument of government. (The word ‘progressive’ is a communist term.)
“This talk has arisen largely under the New Deal ...
“Among those who believe the courts should accept social and economic CHANGE as a controlling factor in approving or nullifying legislation, and who are profoundly dissatisfied with the artificial barriers provided by State lines, is Senator Wagner of New York.
“Senator Wagner, himself a lawyer and former justice of a high State tribunal, and sponsor in his Senatorial career of much social reform legislation, believes that adherence to the letter of a document (the Constitution of the United States) adopted nearly 10 years ago by thirteen seaboard States, with few of our present problems, tends to make of that document a DEAD THING, rather than the living organism it was intended to be. Such INTERPRETATION, he believes, is contrary to the best legal thought of our whole history, and he foresees what might amount to a blockade of ‘public welfare’ legislation unless State frontiers cease to be barriers in the path of SOCIAL ADVANCEMENT.
“... ‘Has the Federal Government acted within the limits of its delegated authority under the commerce clause, or has it overstepped the boundry that separates national action FROM State action?’
“Neither of these boundaries, said Senator Wagner, should be fixed or inflexible, because ‘changing social and economic conditions transmute personal questions into social questions and State issues into national issues.’ (This was nothing but slick talk to get around the oath to uphold and defend the Constitution).
“... The most common - albeit the most startling proposal - is to ABOLISH so-called States rights (Tenth Amendment) entirely, preserving State lines only for sentimental reasons, and reapportion the United States into eight or TEN great departments, to be locally self-governed but WITHOUT the power to hamstring the national government in its legislative acts.
“There is NO PURPOSE to abolish the Constitution or deprive the Supreme Court of its self-assumed power to pass on legislation [determine whether a proposed law is within the framework of the Constitution]. There would still be that system of checks - the whole Federal process remaining the same, EXCEPT that State governments as such would CEASE to exist.â€
Remember, the preceeding was in 1935. What about Today’s Reality? The map below is from an official government publication supplied to the editor by the Second Amendment Committee located in California, Bernadine Smith, Chairman. Notice the date: 1991!!!
In the 1930s when people rejected the idea of abolishing the States, the method by which the effort was to be continued was revealed in the very last two paragraphs of The New York Times Magazine article. Judges were to be selected who would “begin with unanimity to INTERPRET law in the light of the CHANGES†desired by the designers of the New World Order.
Notice the concluding statement: “... if the Federal courts soon experience a MIRACULOUS TRANSFORMATION and begin with unanimity INTERPRETING LAW in the light of social CHANGE.â€
Geographical, physical, economic, and social CHANGES were then engineered to accommodate and promote the TRANSITION with the Congress supplying continual legislation to advance the effort. By keeping the people in utter ignorance, what was once a theory in the thirties, has become an accomplished fact as of 1991. DUAL GOVERNMENTS have been in operation since the United Nations ten regions were installed. Constitutional government hangs on a thin thread!!! As soon as our guns [2nd Amendment right] are taken away, our Constitution and individual land ownership will cease, which is a stated goal of the United Nations. Our State Legislatures could stop this, as in FDR’s day, if they would!
Who Started the Transformation?
Luther H. Gulick, Charles E. Merriam, and Louis Brownlow were hired by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt [socialist] and became the central figures in the early planning for the overthrow of the American form of government. One of their intentions was to abolish the states and replace them with “regions.†They conceived the methodologies and techniques now being used in the gradual step-bystep transformation of the United States FROM a republic INTO a democracy, therefore, a link in a socialist new world order. They used “democracy†as a stand-in word for communist/socialist practices and principles that were to come.
Luther Gulick expressed his feelings for the states in this way: “Is the state the appropriate instrumentality for the discharge of important functions? The answer is not a matter of conjecture, or delicate appraisal. It’s a matter of brutal record: The American states are finished! I do not predict that the states will go! I affirm that they HAVE GONE!â€
Charles E. Merriam was the go-between for the Rockefeller family and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Merriam stated: “Fortunately, our Constitution is broad enough in its terms, flexible enough in its spirit, and capable of liberal enough INTERPRETATION by the judiciary to permit the adaptation of DEMOCRACY to changing conditions without serious difficulty.â€
In his book, entitled: On the Agenda of Democracy, Merriam revealed what is meant by democracy. It meant the adoption of communist/socialistic principles and goals. Many gradual step-by-step alterations were introduced leading toward the decline and eventual elimination of the state as an entity. Do we still have the Tenth Amendment called States Rights? NO! We are always trumped by the Federal Government. Charles E. Merriam was the mentor to F.D.R. and was funded by the Rockefeller family.
The National Resources Planning Board during the FDR Administration put forth the plan to abolish the States.
Re-Making of Human Society
In 400 B.C., Plato wrote a book called The Republic. Around 1600 A.D., Thomas More wrote Utopia. Around 1650 A.D., Francis Bacon told the world about New Atlantis. By 1700 A.D., an Italian named Campanella, described his ideal State as The City of the Sun. Then came an Englishman, Robert Owen, who wrote a book called New View of Society.
All of these plans abolished private property and human competition. All provided for collective ownership and rigid state control. They were an exercise in futility. Communism didn’t work then, and it still does
not work. You cannot reward a non-worker by taking away from the real producer. This is exactly what Obama is advocating by saying, “spreading the wealth around is a good thing.†THAT IS PURE MARXISM!!!
In Russia, a few autocrats sought to weld 160,000,000 people into a centrally controlled government. They established in 1917-1921, not a social democracy, but a social treadmill that was forced to move along by the bayonet and the machine gun!!! The sound of firing squads was heard with almost as much regularity as the sound of the morning whistle summoning men to work. The dictatorship of the proletariat was and still is attempting to smother, BY FORCE, the desire to possess private property. Where Americans toil so that they can possess something for themselves and their children, Russians and all Communist countries now toil because they have bayonets at their backs.
The 20th century attempt to re-make human society in Russia alone took a staggering human toll. Without counting the murders of the Czar, his wife and children, and thousands of old nobility, the following have, up to 1931, been EXECUTED in the course of Russia’s “experiment:†28 bishops, 1,219 priests, 6,000 teachers, 9,000 doctors, 54,000 officers, 200,000 soldiers, 70,000 policemen, 12,950 land-owners, 355,250 intellectuals and professional men [including bankers], and 815,000 peasants. A total, through 1931, of at least 1,750,000 were executed or massacred in the process of re-making Russian society! What will be the final toll of Americans when the military or U.N. troops FORCE the New World Order upon us???
In the same period 18,000,000 Rusians died of starvation, and one to two million Russians are still dying annually from hunger and cold. Not long ago, two thousand peasant farmers were shot in one day because they sought to hold back from government grain collectors enough of their own grain to keep themselves and their families from starvation! In the name of order, obedience and regimentation, Russian firing squads lined up 14 head men of peasant villages and shot them to death simply because these men and their humble village folk wished to possess the fruits of their own toil. Political opponents of the existing order are exiled or executed. Siberian prison camps have overflowed since the inception of Communism.
Free speech, as we know it in our capitalist country, is non-existent. When Lenin assumed power and began his “experiment†in re-making human society in Russia, he made the following announcement: “The dictatorship of the proletariat is nothing else than power based upon FORCE and LIMITED BY NOTHING - by NO law and NO rule.†America has been on this road since before FDR took office! The Russian revolutionists inaugurated their program with the avowed purpose of seizing ALL land and other forms of wealth, and holding it in common for all the people! Their confiscation scheme has been carried out since 1921, BUT instead of everyone having more than they had before, everyone has less until this writing!!! The “planned economy†of dictatorially decreeing everyone something RESULTED in no one having anything. Instead of common wealth, there is common POVERTY. Is this what Obama wants for America by “spreading the wealth around?†Capital may be destroyed by confiscation DISGUISED as taxation!!! All socialist countries are heavily taxed; therefore, their wealth is confiscated.
This is only a sample taken from the magazine......
Main Page | Place an Order
The following is a list of items to which there is not enough pages to justify a separate category. Yet, we feel they are still important enough to archive. As new information is added to this website, some of these items may be moved to their own category.
The Zionist Jew, According to the Jewish Encyclopedia
Census 2000 Fraud: Hate Crimes Against Americans
Los Angeles Times Article on Mind Control / Manchurian Candidates
FBI Project Megiddo - Fighting "domestic terrorism" by religious extremists, militia groups? A transcript of the FBI initiative, taken from their own website.
Analysis of the FBI Project Megiddo Report
An FBI Agent Talks About Megiddo
Justice Vision: A Vision of the System of Justice in the Year 2020
Documents Available from CDR
Trilateral Commission / Council on Foreign Relations Membership List
Notes From Jackie Regarding the Chemtrail Document Packet
The Cover-up of an Atrocity
Details of New World Order Map
Dan Druck: Staying On Track
A Bill Requiring Treasury Secretary to Design Counterfeit-Proof $100 Bill
No comments:
Post a Comment