Monday, November 28, 2011

right to travel vs drive

Attention!: Print & Carry!
NOTICE:All Rights Reserved
5USC
1946 administrators procedures act
All Privileges DECLINED.
UCC 1-308 Without Prejudice
Convention on Consular Relations-United Nations Treaty
Universal Declaration of Human Rights-United Nations Treaty

Your OATH OF OFFICE is hereby Accepted as Binding Contract.
CAVEAT:42 USC § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of practice.” Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24. “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491. “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. US, 230 F 486, 489. “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.” Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946.
MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 The Constitution is the Supreme Law.
U.S. Constitution Article 6 This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
NORTON V. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U. S. 425
An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Dear Law Enforcement Officer:
With all due respect,
Demand for Trial By Jury to First decide the innocence or guilt of this
individual upon the instant matter is hereby made on all proceedings arising
from charges made by this Officer or Department of Government.

Demand that Nature and Cause be proven into the record of the Court for any
charges arising from charges made by this Officer or Department of
Government is hereby demanded.

Please attach this document in it's entirety with any charge, summons, or
information you may make regarding me as this Document constitutes a
specific demand for Jury trial to FIRST decide my innocence or guilt and
that the Nature and Cause for said charge be proven in this or any matter
arising out of this matter and that it must be made a part of the record of
any and all proceedings as my communication to the court and as these
demands are fully supported by the 6th amendment to the Constitution of the
United States of America (the law of the land, all others notwithstanding).

I am hereby informing you that I do not consent to talk to you, and that I
must insist, unless you are placing me under arrest, or can state specific
and articulable facts which warrant your detaining me that you immediately
leave me alone to go about my business, as is my right as a United States
Citizen or State National.

I am engaged in the ownership and use of Property belonging to me as I see
fit to use it, and as is my Constitutional Right to do. My responsibility
to that act does not extend beyond any harm my decision does to another. If
you (the officer or applicable Department of Government) are attempting to
curtail my free use of my property you are hereby requested to identify the
injured party and to instruct said injured party articulate the specific
harm I or my use of my property has caused, in writing and provided to me
and to the applicable court.

Should you choose to ignore this request and to detain me or cause me
costly litigation knowing that no injured party exists as a result of my
actions, be advised you are very likely acting outside the authority of your
office and your Sovereign immunity.

I am not operating a motor vehicle pursuant to USC Title 18 Sec. 31,
definitions.

Whereas I recognize it is your charge to protect the safety and welfare of
the citizenry, you must also see that I have not harmed nor caused to be
harmed anyone. I state here and now that I have exercised my unalienable
rights in a fashion that is within the meaning and protection of the U. S.
Constitution and beyond that I have no responsibility.

In addition, as it is my opinion, this detention is completely about
converting my money to the use of this municipality, city, county and/or
state, I inform you that my property is also protected by the Constitution
just mentioned and that my money is my property. I do not choose to
surrender it nor any other right protected for me by that Constitution, nor
could I if I did so choose.

In addition, be advised that any act on your part to proceed under color of
law against me knowing full well I am not party to a contract which enables
you to enforce traffic and property laws (unless, there is a real/true
injured party willing to testify that I have done them harm) will be met
with an aggressive and protracted and time consuming Court battle before a
Jury of my peers.

I HAVE NO HISTORY OF PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AND AM THEREBY NO THREAT TO YOUR
SAFETY AS THIS FACT WILL NOT CHANGE .

IN ADDITION

Any assumed contracts this court or this city may be acting in accordance
with are hereby DENIED.

I was acting within my Rights with respect to the use I made of my property
as is defined in Spann vs City of Dallas, Tx SC (1921)

and/or

I was exercising my Constitutional Right to travel in an automobile as
pointed out in Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago quoted #169NE221 which says:
Use of a highway for purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere
privilege but is a common and fundamental Right of which the Public and
Individuals cannot be deprived.

"Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to
use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an
inalienable right of every citizen." Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal
Jur 3d p.27

"Users of the highway for transportation of persons and property for hire
may be subjected to special regulations not applicable to those using the
highway for public purposes." Richmond Baking Co. v. Department of Treasury
18 N.E. 2d 788.

The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a
livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude
that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the
nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. .
.." Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872

"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from
police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated
in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which
must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667
(1971)

"One who DRIVES an automobile is an operator within meaning of the Motor
Vehicle Act." Pontius v. McClean 113 CA 452

"The word 'operator' shall not include any person who solely transports his
own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or
compensation." Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.833

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport
his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a
mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common
right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012,
and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579.

Also See:

- EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160
- TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78
- WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274
- CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44
- THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492
- U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966)
- GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971)
- CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6
- SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)
- CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978)
researched and furnished by George Mercier, Federal Judge (retired)

Further, If the Authority you are enforcing is assumed by you and your
superiors to be an act of "Police Power" granted the State by the people
pursuant to the State's Right to provide for the Health and Welfare of all
the people, I am informing you that the action to which you are undertaking
now is beyond the scope and limits of such power of the State and I
therefore demand that you cease and desist the present intervention. see
Spann v City of Dallas.

And finally, Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, to make sure all are
informed regarding the fact that my fingerprints are private property which
cannot be taken over your objection without a valid court order.

Respectfully Submitted,

Thursday, November 17, 2011

wake up

http://roarmag.org/2011/09/j14-culminates-into-largest-protest-in-israeli-history/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15014495
http://www.scottgoold.org/classwar.php
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/3887/The-List-of-599-Additives-in-Cigarettes.aspx
http://www.newworldorderinfo.com/eugenics/609/the-elite%E2%80%99s-plan-for-global-extermination/#more-609
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927595
http://thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/9064-mexican-officials-furious-over-atf-gunrunning
http://thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/computers/9122-government-motors-to-track-drivers-with-onstar-sell-data-to-police
Part 6 of 6) The Nazi Banksters' Crimes - Ripple Effect http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5-YCEEqVOA
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/entire-system-has-been-utterly-destroyed-mf-global-collapse-presenting-first-mf-global-casualty
http://blip.tv/jforjustice/the-nazi-banksters-crimes-ripple-effect-final-5726837
http://tvpnc.org/the-prime-law/
http://www.commercialredemption.com/resources/american_hallucination.htm
You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.
free energy magnetic car engine generator http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW4bnuAIhhE
Is The Lucis Trust Behind The Start of The Occupy Movement? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q03FGf9ui7A
http://www.zundelsite.org/
doomsday seed vault http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgbKMSzylS
http://www.parentsinaction.net/english/Prison/OWNERS-OF-THE-PRISON-SYSTEM-IN-AMERICA.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nfVjgp7OYE Freedom Watch Sheriff Mack
Adverse Possession Texas Foreclosure Home for $16 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w22EOq7IsTk
finite resources and arithmatic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY&feature=related
http://sustainablecitiescollective.com/sustentator/23118/bio-fuel-worlds-exemplar-vested-south-america-brazil
http://www.blogdelnarco.com/2011/09/video-decapitan-dos-integrantes-del.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWkls1v6vJE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q-HwlKR6pc&feature=feedf
3000 Watt Generator Powers Itself, Grinder & Drill Press. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv53K9MnDuM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91qs9v-upWI&feature=related SECRET KNOWLEDGE - "NOT FOR US TO KNOW"?
http://freedom-school.com/admiralty/how-to-beat-criminal-charges-in-admiralty-courts.pdf
http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution
http://freemasonrywatch.org/
washington d.c.=masonic mafia,they can't be reasoned with

opt out of social security http://www.ssa.gov/online/ssa-521.pdf

Freemasons the most evil cult in the world*banned on TV* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcyXRl41RoA
who is buying gun companies http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t468802/
SUPREME COURT DECISION;POLICE NOT OBLIGATED TO THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUALS http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0489_0189_ZS.html
COURT DECISION IN CASE CALLED PADLEFORD FAY;CITIZENS CAN'T CLAIM CONSTITUTION,THEY ARE NOT PARTY TO IT. http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/ultimate_delusion.htm
we the 99% need to form a new government and dump the loser system that is now in place
THEY =(T)he (H)ierarchy (E)nslaving (Y)ou
http://finance.uncommonwisdomdaily.com/reports/RWR/GFC/vsp.php?s=CLIST&e=4692101 Urgent New Dollar Disaster Video!
Gerald Celente http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kt-mVWYvOm0
Mark Passio - Free Your Mind Conference 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvNabovREvg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISn65mAzg7E&feature=player_embedded
http://www.whale.to/b/allen_b1.html
international criminal bankers have bought and paid for ALL the SELECTED traitors in Washington D.C.,they plan to Eliminate the middle class. the laws need enforced,arrest the criminal bankers for fraud,theft,arrest the traitors in d.c. trial them for violation of public trust,breech of oath of offfice,treason under 18usc section 2381,replace the traitors,the u.s.treasury can print debt free notes,and tax the private federal reserve bank out of business
http://jforjustice.co.uk/tbcre/index.html nazi banker crimes

http://www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf
PROTESTERS TOOLKIT http://freedom-school.com/admiralty/how-to-beat-criminal-charges-in-admiralty-courts.pdf
Filing a Counterclaim Against the Cop/Cops http://www.mncourts.gov/district/2/?page=874
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/ultimate_delusion.htm
FOX: Diebold Electronic Vote Fraud Confirmed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FPuLNjvAc
UNITED STATES is a Corporation - There are Two Constitutions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0
district of columbia act of 1871 http://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm
The Lightbulb Conspiracy (Full Length - English Subtitles) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1xt4nEvipg&feature=player_embedded
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/10/25/pepsi-shareholders-demand-it-stop-using-aborted-fetal-cells/
http://www.youtube.com/user/InflationUS
money masters http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXt1cayx0hs&feature=related
http://www.peoples-rights.com/doc15England.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrBMi1RgPAQ&feature=related facebook illuminati
Orwell Rolls in his Grave (Full 3HR Documentary) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_lYGyIaK80
extreme cold weather clothes&gear http://wiggys.com/
free market is a fraud http://www.cafrman.com/

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Who is buying the companies which manufacture guns?

For the last several years a company called The Freedom Group has been
buying up gun and ammunition manufacturers. Some of the companies are
Bushmaster, Marlin, Remington, DPMS, Dakota Arms and H&R. Some people worry
that this Freedom Group is going to control most of the firearms
companies in the United States. If you control the manufacturers you can
decide to stop selling to civilians. What a perfect way to control guns.
Now if you do some digging you will see that The Freedom Group is owned
by a company called Cerberus Capital Management. Guess who controls
Cerberus? GEORGE SOROS ! One of the most evil men on this
planet who wants to restrict or ban all civilian guns.
Please pass this on to all your freedom loving friends. This needs to come
out. Why have
we not heard about this in the "mainstream" media? I would think this
would be BIG news.

If you don't know who George Soros is you need to do some research. He
backed Obama with millions of dollars and Obama is a puppet on a string
controlled by Soros. Send this to every gun owner in America

Monday, November 7, 2011

Occupy Wall St Marine is a fake.

Subject: Occupy Wall St Marine is a fake.

Watch these 3 in order. Now I know why he wasn't assaulted. Soros has planted these actors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suEu1qrYI1s&feature=BFa&list=ULRabCAUl73zc&lf=m fu_in_order

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3icPsBZ-um0&feature=autoplay&list=ULsuEu1qrYI1s& ;lf=mfu_in_order&playnext=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id1cOvqBVPU&feature=BFa&list=ULfL6P0yDKLVc&lf=m fu_in_order

Sunday, November 6, 2011

prison owners repost

Here's some very interesting info about what happens behind the scenes in this corporate Matrix. It appears that the STRAWMAN is considered the vessel, and they seize that vessel which they own, by arresting you, but they still need you to identify yourself as the strawman in order to have jurisdiction. Which would mean that if you've separated yourself from your SM, and don't admit to be the all-caps NAME, they have to release you.



OR, since these are basically "in rem" proceedings in Admiralty, you've got to assert a CLAIM against that vessel/strawman, which could be done with a UCC-1 lien and counter-claim. Also, if the Secretary of Transportation is the receiver of the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES, then it should be him who should satisfy claims of creditors, such as we do using A4V and set-off, since we are creditors of United States because we're the only ones contributing value into the US bakruptcy.



"OWNERS OF THE PRISON SYSTEM IN AMERICA"
*Owners of the Prison Systems in America* CORRECTION CORP OF AMERICA headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee owns all private prison systems in AMERICA and are selling the commercial paper. How it Works: A bid bond is done on Form 24, which comes out of the GSA Office (General Services Administration which is out of GAO (General Accounting Office} which is under the Comptroller General. This Blake Bond Bid Bond is promulgated at the time the social security card is issued. When you are arrested the bond is filled out and they issue a Performance Bond, which is done from Form 25, and then they do a Payment Bond, which is a Form 25A.
The Bonds are being underwritten by the Banks. This is where the PAINE WEBBER GROUP comes in. The Plaintiff in all criminal tax cases in the USA is the PAINE WEBBER GROUP as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is a group of international businesses. The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is providing the Securities for the prisons and is selling the Bonds, and the Banks, The ABA (AMERICAN BANKING ASSOCIATION) like LEHMEN BROTHERS, in New York City, are the underwriters on the Bonds. The Banks (the underwriters) is where the money is originally coming from.
A six digit tracking number is issued for the Certificate of Stocks in the Commodity and Security Exchange in the USA by CUSIP (see http://www.cusip.com/ and http://www.cjts.com/ the law enforcement tracking software) and a nine digit number (called Ordnance Number) is issued for the Certificate of Stocks going internationally to ANNA (Lynn's note: see link for ANNA which is in Brussels, Belgium at www.cusip.com ). These Securities are sold through the Commodity and Security Exchange. The bottom line is they are selling stocks in the prison system. The jails are referred to as Warehouses and the prisoners are called Goods (oops, Lynn had it 'wrong'....she told the ladies in Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center that we were in the Warehouse and we were the 'Merchandise' which explained the many flimsy reasons many of the ladies were in the prison.....it was just business, and just revenue). They are selling the Goods or the Account as Chattel, and as Commercial Paper on the Stock Exchange. Reminds one of the days when slaves were bought and sold on the auction block!


The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is the prime stockholder in this CCA (Correction CORP of America). (Lynn's note: the transport company who transported her to Colorado in a van with 16 other prisoners being transported about had the words "Transport Corporation of America....Nashville, Tennessee." Transport rides are also called 'diesel therapy' by those who know about them.} However twenty of the largest companies such as WAL-MART; EXON; GENERAL MOTORS; FORD MOTORS; CHEVY; TEXICO; CITY CORP; IBM; EXPHILIP; HEWLETT PACKARD; VERIZON; UNITED POSTAL SERVICE (UPS); and etc. are also involved as well as other stock holding corporations (There are sixteen pages of the names of corporations that hold these stocks amounting to billions of [dollars].) Of course the monies generated is all off budget with no accounting to the People, even though the CORRECTION CORP OF AMERICA through the PAINE WEBBER GROUP is acting in the capacity of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: Promotes Privatization of the Prison System. Paul Weybrick (may be miss spelled) runs what is called the FREE CONGRESS FOUNDATION, which owns the AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL. THE REASON FOUNDATION and THE CORNELL COMPANY are involved as well.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just found the notes on Jack Smith and Gene Keating’s research on prisoner bonds (not the kind you bail out with). http://www.cjts.com/ is the criminal justice tracking system software which shows the software that metro police departments use. Go to the user manual and it takes to 2% appearance bond fees. Then go to special operating software for courtrooms and it shows you how the 2% appearance bond fees are tied to the defendant's account. Go to the bottom in the original user's manual and it says, "Fine accounting." Further up the page is assessments. it shows how it's all tracked from beginning to end. FONTDIV
A caller wrote to a court once and send, "Send me a complete accounting of my case." It came back showing a $90,000 active security and they said, "Your paperwork has been forwarded to the Department of Justice." The caller wrote a week later and said, "Send me a final pay-off amount for all my money. What would there be after 18 years without any fees, fines and interest."
They said, "We sent all your stuff to the Department of Justice. Go to GOTOBUTTON BM_3_ www.cjts.com and you'll see all there is to see about a public witness. The caller downloaded it. Roger Elvick had written something about stock exchange transactions.
Once you get the bond you are creditor in fact. Alan comes on the phone call with Jack Smith who had studied Roger Elvick's stuff intensely. He understands marketing accounts and the courts. Roger had said, "We have to find a way to track the account." The caller on Jack's program grabbed the phone book and just randomly picked a brokerage company .......


AG Edwards. He called up to talk to a broker. Caller says he's trying to figure something out. If there was someone trading bonds in the bond market in the caller's name without his permission could he track the account. AG Edwards broker says they would have to have a social security number or a driver's license number. Caller says he knows someone who was trading in Roger Elvick's name. Broker asked if it was a friend, family member or corporation? Caller said to the broker it was a corporation. Broker then said every bond has a cusip #........Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Process Number.
You can go to www.cusip.com. There are two main outlets -- Chicago and New York. You'd have to find out who their transfer agents are and then you could track the trade. You can even find out if funds are being embezzled off the account.


When the cop gives you a ticket and you go into court, the judge is using this as a credit item to trade in the markets and he's doing calls. What if someone went in and caught them short on the margin call?
The broker at AG Edwards knew what the caller was talking about. He said, "IF you want to follow this up anymore, you'll have to go to the Securities Exchange division in your state. So, the next thing the caller did was check the Department of Financial Institution of his state on the web and looked up securities exchange division. The advisory committee showed AG Edwards was the transfer agent for the state, making all the bond trades.


The cop does all the paper work in the car. He is creating the assessment and the paperwork in his car when he makes out the ticket by using name, social security number, and driver's license number. They assume you voluntarily gave it to the cop and made the trade. Every cop is a private business contractor working for the corporation. If this is true then you can follow up on every trade made in your name on your exemption. Find the bond written on your birth certificate. Use that and access your exemption through the stock market that way.


Roger Elvick knew this. The transfer and transfer agent and the number with social security number and every case number will be listed. Every traffic ticket will be listed. Broker says if Ameritrade had a trade he could track it, but he can't track AG Edwards, and others. It's going to take someone higher up. The brokers are enslaved by their industry. When you have a job your company is using your social security number.


They'll keep taking your exemption even if you leave that company. AG Edwards sells the prisoner/traffic bonds for several states. How does this correlate with admiralty? Jack Smith says that in admiralty the vessels are carrying commodities and goods. So they carry invoices, packing slips and bills of lading. Warrants and securities back up the goods. Lag--goods that float on the water. Gene Keating says that Title 46 is the shipping code in admiralty. Secretary of Transportation is the receiver of the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES -- section 1247 Title 46--he's the receiver and trustee. He's talking about the carriage of goods sea act which is Title 46 in the appendix. Bills of lading are all documents of title--warrants and documents are all under the UCC and deal with documents of title. Title 46 Sections 181-189--admiralty is very complex. Even judges are taught on a need to know basis. Appellate judges often don't know all this.


This all leads to different aspects of admiralty/maritime law, both inside and outside the courtroom. The carriage of goods act, Title 46, is all governed by the Secretary of Transportation--the Coast Guard, Secretary of Commerce and the treasury are all under Secretary of Transportation and it's all in commerce. The Secretary of transportation is the head of the maritime commission. All vessels are registered under Title 46, Section 31-301 which talks about maritime liens that arise by operation of law. There's a maritime lien commission. The Secretary of Transportation is running everything because we are all on the 'highway of commerce'--the water came inland, so to speak, and now it's here under the law of trust. Everyone who comes into the courtroom is a ward in admiralty--a ward of the court. We're in an "in rem" proceeding in admiralty in a title dispute and we have to come in as the title holder or have interest or claim in the subject matter of the complaint, or we are the 'vessel' and they have arrested 'the vessel.'


We're not in common law in the courts, we're in admiralty and they get jurisdiction by arresting the vessel. They (lawyers/district attorneys/law enforcement) don't use the proper process and they need to trick, cajole, deceive, pressure us to do whatever they need to do and have us make a mistake to give them 'in personam jurisdiction' over us when we take on the attributes of a general appearance to the subject matter of the pleadings against the defendant "in rem" and we start acting in any capacity on the merits of the charges or by taking on the persona of the defendant vessel 'in rem.' There's lots more to this, but I think you get the gist about 'prisons for profit.'


In tying this all together it would appear that there are many laggard souls, some are incarcerated in prison and some are working in the prisons. And many, many more are indifferent to what is going on in our country as far as prisons and prisoners are concerned. When I explained my case to women, many said, “Why do you bother trying to change things? To stand up to the system?” I’d always explain to them the concept of our earth trying to ascend to higher consciousness and take all the souls along, even the laggard souls. I’d explain how we could use the light of the angels, masters and God through us as flashlights .....

The source for this bulletin is Ed Brannum of Texas and this message was appended to his email:
I do not have a problem you with giving out my EMail address. All the Feds have known it for years. It’s hard trying to teach those PERSONS while they are monitoring me.

"The following message is for any/all Corporate Agents/informants/investigators et. al. working in collusion by monitoring my mail and any other communications without my permission."

"I sui juris, a republic of Texas National American Sovereign neutral non-combatant by law declare to all Corporate combatant FEDERAL and/or STATE Agents and/or 3rd parties that I am not a Corporation and/or UNITED STATES/STATE Created Fiction and I am accepting all Oaths and Affirmations declared Under Penalties of Perjury "so help me God" and returning any/all actions from the same being brought/sought against me for want of Geographical Jurisdiction and Venue."

Thursday, November 3, 2011

chrysler,a dirty story

Chrysler - A Very Dirty Story
Sooner or later it will all come to light!
This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate orClinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison.

Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed?

Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered

to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."

Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM.

The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.

Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.

Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true!

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.

Now the plot thickens.

Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?

Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.

Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the

federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealershipon the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $20000 to Obama's campaign.

Does that seem a little odd to you?

Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.

Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."

On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri . It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.

Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.

These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company

title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one! While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!

Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing?

Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.

Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and

the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market.

Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.

As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America , it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda

There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators

demanding answers for what has been done.

Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this.

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Car Czar No More

An amazing thing happened as this story was going

to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom.

According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family."

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."

By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New

York .....

Uh-oh!

But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really?

Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!
Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."

Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they all have

"unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say!

SOOOOO. HOWS THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..

Check it out at the following websites.....

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html

This goes from beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on the part of our government!

I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will demand some of that transparency we were promised....... followed by criminal prosecution of the perpetrators!
--

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: TITLE 18 USC LAWSUIT – TONY DAVIS

FlashingLightsStraightAni.gif Please Forward Far and Wide FlashingLightsStraightAni.gif



Help me Help others……



SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: TITLE 18 USC LAWSUIT – TONY DAVIS



A MOST IMPORTANT CALL

www.FreedomsRadio.com

9pm EST / 6pm Pacific Tuesday





M A R K Y O U R C A L E N D A R





The following is an eMail exchange between Mrs. Edgar j. Steele and Michael Edward with commentary from another eMail exchange between Tony Davis and Patty Levy. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT YOU UNDERSTAND THIS SIGNIFICANCE.



Dear Mrs. Steele



I am Michael Edward.



We’ve communicated in the past where I offered to work with you for Edgar’s release utilizing the power of Statewide Communications found at www.AmericansWithPitchforks.com. [AWP]



Under that umbrella you will find www.PoliticalPrisonersOfAmerica.com.



This is where I thought I may be the most help.



It occurred to me, when I received this eMail below that ES may very well be interested in seeing what Pro Se’s do ‘outside the box’.



One of the web sites under AWP is www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com and this is the type of work that flows from that assembly.



The following very well pertains to anyone who is presently incarcerated under federal 18 USC.



Frankly, I wouldn’t normally think to share this with an attorney, however, giving Edgar’s situation, he may wish to take a look at it, regardless.







Attached is the email from Levy's wife. His attorney screwed up on the grand jury argument. You never ask for grand jury records. You show the court why the grand jury proceedings were invalid.

If I had know he was going to use an affidavit from me, I would have told him not to. It is hearsay.

The rest of the exhibits are government records and are self-authenticating. Loraine Miller statement is easily fixable. We can talk about that tomorrow night.



----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Patty Levy
To: Abogado Ray
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 5:39 AM
Subject: Raphael Levy777

Good News and Bad News, the bad news is I am still here. The judge Denied the Motion that Mr. Perez put in for the Grand Jury Transcripts...in open court today...The Good News is that the Judge took everything very seriously - He accepted the Reply and all of the Exhibits, with the exception of your Affidavit....The judge drilled me on the predecessor of title 18 (1948) the 1909. My respond was the Fair Warning Doctrine...which prevents any district court from obtaining jurisdiction pursuant to the 1909 codification of Title 18. He also drilled me and Title 28 Public Law 80-773 of June 25, 1948.The judge hit me hard with exhibit D the last paragraph.... "HR 3190 was passed by the House and Senate on June 18 1948, and became Public Law 80-772 on June 25 , 1948......" perhaps we can get some clarification from Lorraine Miller. The last thing was that the Judge order the government to respond and address all of the Exhibit by Nov. 23 , 2011 and gave me one more chance to reply to the government by Dec 10. 2011.Please let me know what you recommend I do for now.....thank youRRL-777



CLASS ACTION



A. Class Action Being Filed



The most significant challenge to federal court jurisdiction is being

filed shortly as a class action challenging the jurisdiction of the DOJ to incarcerate federal prisoners. LAW is a group dedicated to the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. The lawsuit, in D.C., seeks expungement plus $3,000/day/person. Cost is $2,000 to cover expenses.[1]



B. The Challenge



Our group has obtained and verified the evidence directly from

Congress that Public Law 80-772 was never passed by Congress, the only statute which gives the court jurisdiction to indict and convict on any crime (Title 18, Title 21, Title 26). No court has addressed the challenge as presented properly[2], nor the evidence obtained by us directly from Congress. Over 3 years, all administrative and court remedies have been exhausted.



C. Bond Opens the Door



One of the most significant cases in recent history related to jurisdiction and the right to challenge a federal statute was ruled on by the Supreme Court on June 16, 2011. In Bond v. United States, No. 09-1227, the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, ruled that Bond had “standing to challenge a federal statute on grounds that the measure interferes with the powers reserved to States”, pg. 3-14. “Anything in repugnance to the Constitution is invalid or unlawful”. Bond, supra.



Bond now opens the door for us to challenge 18 USC section 3231, part of the enactment of Title 18, which states: “The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.” Without the validity of 18 USC § 3231 a federal court must revert the powers of the federal courts back to the states. The Bond ruling provides standing for anyone to challenge 18 USC § 3231 and any crime that could have been tried by the state where you would have received less time (in many cases the state decided not to prosecute at all). See U.S. v. Sharpnack, 355 US 286 (1957). " It further specifies that "Whoever . . . is guilty of any act or omission which . . . would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State . . . in which such place is situated, by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like [federal] offense and subject to a like punishment."



D. Services Provided By LAW



Class action challenging jurisdiction

Bond v. U.S. petitions for a reduction or elimination of sentence.

3582 crack motions.

28 USC § 2255 motions

28 USC § 2241 petitions

Complete case investigations



WHAT PEOPLE SAY



“I heard your show last night. You were awesome!!” Joe F. Cal., 9/28.11. (LAW has been on radio talk shows 6 times in the last few weeks explaining the class action.)

Over 50 wins!

Only research group accepted directly 5 times on habeas into Supreme Court!

“What you wrote is awesome!” Habeas, NDCal, 8/25/11. Karen F.

Massive Grand Jury Fraud uncovered! C.D.Cal., 6/1/11.

“You’re known for not quitting until you get results.” G. Spry, S.D.W.Va., 6/10/11.



Revised 10/22/11



WHY THE BOP DOES NOT WANT YOU TO JOIN THE CLASS ACTION



After 9 years of research, we have established conclusively by fact and law that Public Law 80-772 was never enacted by Congress, which contains 18 USC § 3231, the only statute allowing a court criminal jurisdiction, making illegal any charge or conviction.

The BOP admitted that in an internal memo from Harley Lappin, BOP Director (below). The facts in the memo have been verified. Thus any court has no jurisdiction to sentence. The BOP Budget for FY 2011 is $6.8 Billion, a 10% increase from 2010.[3] We have already caught one warden giving legal advise.[4] “Trust me, I am from the government.” Or is it about money? Below is memo:



From: "Harley G. Lappin" Sent: Monday, July 27, 20093:17 PM

“Attention all Department Heads, there has been a large volume of inmate Requests for Administrative Remedies questioning the validity of the Bureau's authority to hold or classify them under 18 U.S,C, §§ 4081, et seq., (1948). On the claim that Public Law 80-772 was never passed or signed In the presence of a Quorum or Majority of both Houses of Congress as required by Article I, § 5, Clause 1 of the Constitution, Although most courts have, thus far, retied on Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649(1892) to avoid ruling on the moots of these claims, however, there have been some which have stated that they were not bound by the Field case, but those cases did not involve any Quorum Clause challenge. So out of an abundance of caution, I contacted the Office of Legal . Counsel, the National Archives and the Clerk of the House of Representatives to learn that there is no record of any quorum being present during the May 12, 1947 vote on the H.R. 3190 Bill in the House (See 93 Cong.Rec. 5049), and the record is not clear as to whether there was any Senate vote on the H,R. 3190 Bill during any session of the 80th Congress, There is only one Supreme Court case that says in order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show that it was passed In the presence of a Quorum. See United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). The Clerk of the House states that the May 12, 1947 vote was a 'voice vote,' but the Parliamentarian of the House states that a voice vote is only valid when the Journal shows that a quorum is present and that it's unlawful for the Speaker of the House to sign any enrolled bill in the absence of a quorum. On May 12, 1947, a presence of 218 members in the hall of the House was required to be entered on the Journal in order for the 44 Member 38 to 6 voice vote to be legal. It appears that the 1909 version of the Federal Criminal Code has never been repealed. Therefore, in essence, our only true authority is derived from the 1948 predecessor to Public Law 80-772. "Although adjudication of the constitutionality of congressional enactments has generally been thought to be beyond the jurisdiction of federal administrative agencies, this rule is not mandatory," according to the Supreme Court in the case of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U,S, 200,215 (1994), Therefore, the Bureau under the advise of the Legal Counsel feels that it is in the best interest of public safety to continue addressing all of these Administrative Remedy Requests by stating ,that only the Congress or courts can repeal or declare a federal statute unconstitutional.”



Revised 10/11/11 ©2011



[1] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his “discretion” to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without advising Congress of the problem.

[1] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011 budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment. Obstruction of Congress???







UPDATE ON CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT



A. All administrative remedies have been exhausted



LAW specializes in the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. As of August 31, 2011, LAW had exhausted all administrative remedies related to the class action lawsuit as well as all court remedies, thus freeing up LAW to file the class action.



B. Number of People on the Lawsuit



We currently have about 250 people on the class action. We anticipate having approximately 500 prior to filing. The brief has already been written and will be filed in the next few weeks. Anyone wishing to join should contact us immediately.



C. The Bond Case has Opened the Door



In their 9-0 ruling in Carol Ann Bond v. United States, 09-1227, the Supreme Court stated that any act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is void. Lower courts are required to follow Supreme Court rulings, and we have seen an improved attitude in district courts after the Bond ruling regarding jurisdictional challenges. We currently have filed an amicus curaie brief in a case in Denver, a case in New Jersey, the government has waived argument on a habeas case in Houston, and the district judge in Miami has stated on the record that if the facts could be proven, the person would be released. One of the members of LAW has been interviewed on 6 radio talk shows regarding the petition.



D. Request for Declatory Judgment



As part of the class action lawsuit, LAW will also file a request for Declatory Judgment pursuant to 28 USC § 2201, et seq., in order to force the court to research the Congressional records and declare the statute invalid.



E. Who Is Eligible



Anyone charged with a federal crime since 1948, pretrial, post-trial, or released.







From: Edgar J. Steele
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 7:04 PM
To: Thee Scotsman
Subject: Announcement and two messages from Edgar Steele, 10/31/2011



Our message today contains an announcement and two documents.



ANNOUNCEMENT: North Idaho TV station KXLY will air an interview with Mr. Steele, in prison on Thursday, Nov. 3rd at 6:00 pm. It is likely that the interview will be accessible via their web site http://www.kxly.com, if you wish to watch.



The first document is a Press Release which highlights the submission by Mr. Steele of his petitions to the US Supreme Court. Said petition is available to view on the Free Edgar Steele web site. The second document is Mr. Steele's latest installment for chapter 7 of his planned book, "Evil Edgar".



A heart-felt thanks goes out to all of Mr. Steele's supporters who helped so eagerly with the letter-sending campaign in recent weeks. The campaign has not ended; if you'd like to send letters to the USSC, check out our web site! Thank you.



============================================



POLITICAL PRISONER EDGAR J. STEELE PETITIONS U.S. SUPREME COURT

Moscow, Idaho, October 31, 2011 - Convicted in another U.S. government show trial this year, author and attorney Edgar Steele will ask the highest court in the land to address non-written rules that allow unlawful and unconstitutional intrusions into what should be completely private attorney-client communications. In the Petition, U.S. Supreme Court Case Number 11-7108, filed today, Mr. Steele champions the rights of all federal detainees whose confidential letters and discussions are regularly recorded, intercepted and passed on to prosecutors and judges in spite of well-established court regulations to the contrary.

Mr. Steele was arrested June 11, 2010 based on an FBI-manufactured informant's report that Steele wanted his wife of 25 years – as well as his wife's mother – killed. Steele's long-time handyman Larry Fairfax was enlisted by the FBI to entrap him, through the use of hidden microphone recordings which supposedly the two men had just prior to his arrest. Many who watched the trial, which ended May 5, 2011, observed that it was a ‘kangaroo court' proceeding with the judge excluding all evidence favorable to Mr. Steele.

In an Affidavit filed with the trial court in August, former attorney, Mr. Robert McAllister, once a U.S. prosecutor, admitted that he was wholly ineffective as Mr. Steele’s counsel and failed to offer even a fraction of the available proof of innocence. Mr. McAllister, who declared bankruptcy in March, was disbarred in Colorado shortly after the Steele trial because of embezzlement of client funds. His Affidavit cited his anxiety over the pending disbarment as the reason for non-performance at the Steele trial.

The U.S. Supreme Court Petition filed today by Mr. Steele does not address ineffectiveness of counsel, rather it seeks dismissal because the judge, the US Marshals Service and the prosecutor colluded to enforce new “rules” of procedure that were not pre-approved by the high court. These new rules allowed recording of Mr. Steele’s conversations with his attorneys, so that the prosecution team could anticipate and counter his every move.

Supposed murder-for-hire target, Cyndi Steele (Edgar's wife), has asserted unwavering confidence in her husband's complete innocence. She has publicly denounced as fabricated the recording “evidence” of her husband supposedly directing handyman Fairfax to arrange her demise. This case gained national notoriety when a pipe bomb planted by the government informant was found attached to Mrs. Steele’s car during an oil change the day of her husband’s first hearing, June 15, 2010, in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

A 40-page combined Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition, plus 194 pages of supporting documents in an Appendix were submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court. This could be a landmark case. But, if the USSC refuses to hear the Petition, it sends a message to lower courts and prosecutors that they can, without restriction, make up their own rules and function outside the Constitution; especially when they seek conviction of the innocent who have proven to be politically incorrect. Steele says that prosecuting him was “pay-back” for his years of defending those who had been attacked by an oppressive government.

Mr. Steele's sentencing hearing on mandatory prison terms totaling sixty or more years, is set for November 9th. In approaching the Supreme Court, he requests dismissal of the 4-count conviction, or a new trial where the old “tainted” files are sealed and a new prosecutor and judge are restricted from gaining defense strategy through eavesdropping. A new trial would also allow
introduction of audio forensic analysis by experts, showing the Fairfax hidden microphone recordings are unreliable and have been manipulated (or even manufactured) by the FBI.

For more information, visit the FES web site or contact Robert Magnuson, Vice-President of the Edgar Steele Defense Fund, at: 208-304-6608



============================================



You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part VIII)
by Edgar J. Steele

October 31, 2011

I like to say that, while we never want to repeat boot camp, always we are glad to have had the experience. Jail is (way) different. Never will I say that I am glad I spent this time in jail. Perhaps a week or two in jail, at most, would be instructive for many of us, but extended imprisonment simply exacts too great a personal toll to justify the lessons it teaches.

The Real Cost of Imprisonment
Don’t Do the Crime if you Can’t Do the Time?



No. Don’t do the crime, to be sure, but “serving” time simply makes no sense for, perhaps, 95% of all current prisoners in America. Serving time creates massive unemployment (ex-convicts are unemployable), turns ordinary people into “nothing to lose” criminals, hardens petty truants and mischief-makers into genuinely dangerous criminals, fuels the exploding use of drugs throughout America and costs an ever-exploding share of federal, state and local budgets (America’s prison population has tripled during the last two decades).



Nor is the cost restricted to government. The War on Drugs inexorably becomes a war on Americans, with drug users criminally seeking money for their habits and law enforcement officers desperately trying to advance themselves and their departmental funding. America’s prison industry (yes, that is exactly what American jails and prisons have become) now is a huge slavering, self-sustaining beast, out of control and growing ever-faster as its product (discontent, resentment, rebellion and hopelessness) increasingly provide its own raw material (ordinary people-cum-criminals).



The Criminalization of Innocence



Worse, even ignoring those jailed for victimless “crimes” (drug users, tax avoiders/evaders, etc.), a huge and growing segment of America’s prison population consists of people who are innocent! How could it be otherwise, after all, with the Feds’ 97% conviction rate and a tripling of American prisoners in just 20 years?



I have been telling you how they’re doing it to me. I face 60 years, minimum, for a crime I did not commit; a crime with no victim, no damage and the self-confessed perp already serving his 2-year sentence (a slap on the wrist in exchange for his false testimony against me). No – actually, there was some damage: $45,000 in silver bullion stolen by the perp from my wife (the victim) and myself.



From the beginning, my wife (the “victim,” don’t forget) resolutely has stood by my side, proclaiming my innocence to the world, despite the massive federal effort to put me away for the rest of my life.



60 Years!



Murderers routinely are released from prison after serving 6-8 years, but no less than 60 years is what our government says I deserve for the (non) “crime” I committed against nobody, least of all my biggest supporter: my wife. 60 years! Think about it for a moment.



What’s more, the government repeatedly has lied, cheated and stolen during its scorched-earth campaign against me, a genuine American political dissident. There are so many stories of government treachery in my case that I could tell you (not to mention many other cases I have handled, mostly pro bono, during my 30-year career as a trial lawyer).



How They Do It



In the last 7 weekly installments, I have been serializing part of a chapter from my upcoming book, Evil Edgar. I have told you precisely how the feds and the judge illegally, unethically and unconstitutionally have denied me the right to confidential communications with my attorneys, while using the information they illegally obtained by eavesdropping against me – before, during and after my trial.



Of All Things, a Writ Petition



With the deck totally stacked against me, I feel like a drowning man, going down for the third time. Desperate times call for desperate measures, so I have just unleashed the “Hail Mary” of all legal maneuvers. This past week, I filed a Petition for Writ with the U.S. Supreme Court, highest court in America.



U.S. Supreme Court Writ petitions almost never are granted, I was taught over 30 years ago in law school. I recall the image conjured by my law professor then, of a mail-room clerk stamping “Rejected” on all the just-opened envelopes holding Writ petitions.



What else can I do? The very same Federal District Court judge who refused to allow me to put on any sort of defense at trial now is bent upon denying me confidential access to any appellate attorneys to help me with my appeal, due out in 3 weeks.



My combined Petition for Writs of Mandamus (tell ‘em to do something, Supremes) and Prohibition (tell ‘em to stop doing something else) concerns only the topic of the last seven installments: the illegal invasion and denial of my 5th and 6th Amendment right to confidential “assistance of counsel.”



Predictably, my petition for writ is a substantial legal filing. Go here for a copy of the Writ petition. Go here for a 23-page, plain language, synopsis of the governmental wrongdoing that led me to file this petition.



What I Want



Here, in brief, are what I ask from the U.S. Supreme Court via my just-filed petition:

1. Writ of Prohibition – Order this trial court (others, too) to stop enforcing the unwritten U.S. Marshals Service policy that allows the Feds to eavesdrop, record and copy all communications (written, telephonic and in-person) between federal detainees and their private (as well as “of record”) lawyers.

2. Writ of Mandamus – Order the outright dismissal of my case or, in the alternative, a new (and, hopefully this time a fair) trial, because of the extensive governmental and judicial misconduct that has taken place.


You Can Help



Please help in drawing attention to my Petition for Writs, thereby enhancing the chance that the Supremes will agree to schedule it for hearing. Go here for a letter to supporters describing how to join our letter-writing campaign to the Supreme Court justices, Presidential candidates, congressional leaders and mass media outlets.



Let’s face it – since they have eliminated virtually all of the “Movement” leaders and now are imprisoning Movement lawyers, too, just who do you suppose will be there to help when the Feds come for you?



If we can just get the U.S. Supreme Court to hear my Petition, then it certainly will grant it. That would make a huge difference to thousands of federal detainees, both now and going forward. We would strike a genuinely history-making blow for liberty in our time.

I still wouldn’t be able to say I am glad to have spent all this time in jail, but I would be proud of the outcome. Very proud.



Together



Together, we can do this.

Together, we can make a difference.

Together, we can strike a blow that, just maybe, will begin America’s march back from the very precipice of outright, full-blown tyranny.



Join us.



Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele



Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.





You are receiving this email because you are a member of www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com and your email preferences are set to allow notification emails.
If you want to stop receiving these emails, please sign into your account and change your preferences.
If you want to be removed from our database and close your account, please reply to this email with the word REMOVE in the Subject line.
Please DO NOT reply to this email EXCEPT to remove yourself from our database and close your account.
This mailbox is electronically scanned for the word REMOVE in the subject line of received emails. All other email’s received will be deleted.



FlashingLightsStraightAni.gif Please Forward Far and Wide FlashingLightsStraightAni.gif



Help me Help others……

DISCLAIMER: Legal Information is NOT the same as Legal Advice This site provides entertainment/educational information about law designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. But legal educational information is not the same as legal advice. The application of law varies with an individual's specific circumstances. The laws of every state are in constant change, and although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation.

SPAM: We Support Responsible Email Compliance: This email cannot be considered spam as long as we include: Contact information & remove instructions. This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.4176 - SECTION 101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress.

UNSUBSCRIBE: Not responsible for typographical errors. Further transmissions to you may be stopped at no cost to you by replying back with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line of the E-mail which was sent.



Contact Information: Most Affordable Marketing - Administrator 839 Royalwood Lane Oviedo, Florida 32765






[1] A Major federal judge has agreed to hear the issue on October 28, 2011and release person upon evidence. A second major federal judge issued a show cause order to government; government waived argument.

[2] The Enrolled Bill Rule, Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 does not apply to a proper challenge, because Munos Flores, Clinton v. N.Y., and Bond v. United States, all S.Ct. overturned Field v. Clark.

[3] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his “discretion” to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without advising Congress of the problem.

[4] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011 budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment. Obstruction of Congress???